Open Access

Collective governance models within advanced academic settings across Southeast Asian context: empirical exploration grounded on HCM philosophy

4 Department of Social Sciences University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University Hanoi, Vietnam
4 Faculty of Public Policy and Development Studies National Economics University Hanoi, Vietnam

Abstract

The transformation of governance structures in higher education institutions across Southeast Asia has increasingly emphasized participatory, inclusive, and collective decision-making frameworks. This study examines collective governance models within advanced academic settings, with a specific analytical focus on Vietnam and the philosophical foundations derived from Ho Chi Minh (HCM) thought. The research investigates how governance practices integrate democratic participation, institutional leadership, and knowledge management systems to enhance academic quality and institutional effectiveness. Drawing on a qualitative-analytical methodology, the study synthesizes empirical insights from existing literature and theoretical constructs to evaluate the alignment between governance models and socio-political ideologies.

The findings indicate that collective governance in Southeast Asian higher education is characterized by hybrid structures combining centralized authority with participatory mechanisms. HCM philosophy contributes significantly to shaping leadership paradigms, emphasizing moral responsibility, collective accountability, and people-centered governance. The integration of internationalization strategies, knowledge management systems, and innovative pedagogical practices further strengthens participatory institutional frameworks. However, structural limitations, including administrative capacity constraints, uneven stakeholder engagement, and policy inconsistencies, hinder the full realization of democratic governance.

The study contributes to academic discourse by proposing a conceptual governance framework that integrates ideological, institutional, and operational dimensions. It highlights the importance of aligning governance practices with cultural and philosophical contexts while adapting to global educational trends. The research offers practical implications for policymakers and institutional leaders aiming to enhance governance effectiveness in higher education systems. Additionally, it identifies critical gaps in empirical validation and comparative regional studies, suggesting avenues for future research.

Keywords

References

📄 Angyagre, S. E. (2025). Democratic education and the teaching of controversial issues in polarising times: Students’ views and experiences. International Journal of Educational Research, 134, 102847.
📄 Chankseliani, M., Akkad, A., Hanley, N., Kwak, J., & Wang, Z. (2025). International study and democratic consciousness: From formation to engagement. International Journal of Educational Development, 119, 103453.
📄 Ho Chi Minh. (2011). Ho Chi Minh: Complete works (Vol. 4). Hanoi, Vietnam: National Political Publishing House.
📄 Ho Chi Minh. (2011). Ho Chi Minh: Complete works (Vol. 5). Hanoi, Vietnam: National Political Publishing House.
📄 Ho Chi Minh. (2011). Ho Chi Minh: Complete works (Vol. 10). Hanoi, Vietnam: National Political Publishing House.
📄 Hoai, N. T., Duy, L. V. Q., & Cassells, D. (2023). Internationalization as a strategy to enhance higher education quality in Vietnam–reflections from university leaders. The Learning Organization, 30(5), 554-570.
📄 Khoa, B. T., & Huynh, T. T. (2023). The effectiveness of knowledge management systems in motivation and satisfaction in higher education Institutions: Data from Vietnam. Data in Brief, 49, 109454.
📄 Mesny, A., Roberge-Maltais, I., & Galy, A. (2026). Innovative assessment and grading practices in higher education: a critical exploration for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 101307.
📄 Nguyen, D. P., Vickers, M., Ly, T. M. C., & Tran, M. D. (2016). Internationalizing higher education (HE) in Vietnam: Insights from higher education leaders–an exploratory study. Education+ Training, 58(2), 193-208.
📄 Pham, H. H., & Le, T. L. (2023). Entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial intention among higher education students in Vietnam: do entrepreneurial self-efficacy and family support matter?. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(2), 403-422.
📄 Pham, H. T., & Starkey, L. (2016). Perceptions of higher education quality at three universities in Vietnam. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(3), 369-393.
📄 Quy, D. N., Thanh, N. H., & Thanh, N. T. (2025). Developing leaders in Vietnam: Inheriting and applying Ho Chi Minh's ideology on the role of leadership in society. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101818.
📄 Ramos, F., Tavares, A. F., & Da Cruz, N. F. (2025). Between promise and practice: a scoping review of the democratic outcomes of youth participation in local governance. Children and Youth Services Review, 108738.
📄 Ryu, J. H., & Nguyen, A. T. (2021). Internationalization of higher education in Vietnam: current situations, policies, and challenges. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 23(3), 227-241.
📄 Thanh, N. H., & Anh, N. N. (2025). Impacts of personality on the use of online collaborative platforms in higher education in Vietnam. Asian Education and Development Studies.
📄 Tran, C. D., Battese, G. E., & Villano, R. A. (2020). Administrative capacity assessment in higher education: The case of universities in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 102198.
📄 Zehadi, I. A., & Jahan, R. (2025). Students’ views on fostering democratic values and skills through teaching-learning practices in Bangla language classroom. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102151.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.