Peer Review Policy

International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Development (IJSSHD)

The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Development (IJSSHD) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly quality and integrity. All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous, fair, and transparent peer review process to ensure originality, relevance, and academic merit.

1. Type of Peer Review

  • IJSSHD follows a double-blind peer review process, where:

    • The identities of authors are not disclosed to reviewers.

    • The identities of reviewers are not disclosed to authors.

  • This ensures impartiality and unbiased evaluation.

2. Initial Editorial Screening

  • Upon submission, all manuscripts are screened by the editorial team to assess:

    • Relevance to the journal’s scope

    • Originality and academic quality

    • Compliance with formatting and submission guidelines

    • Ethical compliance and plagiarism checks

  • Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without external review.

3. Reviewer Selection

  • Manuscripts are evaluated by at least two independent experts in the relevant field.

  • Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, research experience, and absence of conflicts of interest.

  • Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and provide objective evaluations.

4. Review Criteria

Reviewers assess manuscripts on the following aspects:

  • Originality and contribution to knowledge

  • Clarity of research objectives and methodology

  • Accuracy and validity of results

  • Relevance and significance of conclusions

  • Quality of writing, organization, and structure

  • Adequacy and appropriateness of references

5. Review Outcomes

Based on reviewer recommendations, the editorial team may decide:

  • Accept without revision

  • Accept with minor revisions

  • Revise and resubmit (major revisions)

  • Reject

Authors receive detailed feedback and are expected to address reviewer comments within a specified timeframe.

6. Revision Process

  • Authors must submit a revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments.

  • Revised manuscripts may be sent back to reviewers if necessary.

  • Failure to revise in a timely manner may result in rejection.

7. Editorial Decision

  • The Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors make the final decision on acceptance or rejection.

  • Decisions are based solely on academic merit, reviewer feedback, and journal standards.

  • Editorial decisions are free from commercial or personal influence.

8. Confidentiality

  • All manuscripts and reviewer reports are confidential.

  • Reviewers and editors must not share or use manuscript content for personal advantage.

9. Conflict of Interest

  • Reviewers and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

  • Alternative reviewers are assigned if impartiality cannot be ensured.

10. Ethical Oversight and Misconduct

  • Suspected plagiarism, data falsification, or other misconduct is handled according to COPE guidelines.

  • Confirmed cases may result in rejection, retraction, or notification of the authors’ institution.

11. Recognition of Reviewers

  • IJSSHD values the contributions of reviewers and may acknowledge them annually, while maintaining confidentiality unless consent is given.

12. Policy Updates

  • IJSSHD reserves the right to update this Peer Review Policy as required.

  • Authors and reviewers are encouraged to review the policy periodically.

13. Compliance Statement

By submitting a manuscript to International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Development (IJSSHD), authors agree to abide by this Peer Review Policy and accept the editorial decisions based on peer review.