HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN PEACE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION STUDIES: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS
Abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the historical developments in peace and conflict resolution studies, tracing the evolution of theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and practical applications from their inception to the present day. The study highlights key milestones and paradigms that have shaped the field, including the influence of major historical events, the emergence of new theoretical perspectives, and the impact of interdisciplinary approaches. Through a detailed examination of foundational theories such as realist, liberal, and constructivist perspectives, as well as contemporary developments in peacebuilding and conflict transformation, the paper illustrates how the discipline has responded to the changing dynamics of global conflicts. By analyzing the contributions of prominent scholars and practitioners, this work aims to provide insights into the ongoing challenges and opportunities within peace and conflict resolution studies. Ultimately, the paper seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of how historical contexts have informed current practices and future directions in the field.
Keywords
Peace Studies, Conflict Resolution, Historical Developments, Theoretical FrameworksHow to Cite
Downloads
References
Aron, Raymond, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, London: Transaction, 2003.
Avruch, Kevin, Peter W. Black, and Joseph A. Scimecca (eds.), Conflict Resolution: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, London: Greenwood Press, 1991.
Azar, EdwardE., The Management of Protracted Social Conflict, Hampshire, UK: Dartmouth Publishing, 1990.
Beer, Francis A., Meanings of War and Peace, College Station: Texas A&M University Press 2001.
Beer, Francis A., Peace Against War, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1981.
Boutros Ghali, An Agenda forPeace: preventative diplomacy, peacemaking and peacekeeping, New York: United Nations, 1992.
Bawer, Bruce "The Peace Racket", City Journal, Summer 2007 link.
Burton, J., & EA Azar, International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Wheatsheaf Books, 1986.
Badawi, I. El, & Makdisi, S. (2007). Explaining the democracy deficit in the Arab world. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(5), 813–831.
Friedland, R. (2001). Religious Nationalism and the Problem of Collective Representation. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 125–152.
Gurr, T. D. (1993). Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, D.C: Institute of Peace.
Hunt, C. and L. H. (1980). Sociology (Fifth Edit). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jones, C. (1999). Ideo-theology and the Jewish state: from conflict to conciliation?
British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 26(1), 9–26.
Kelman, H. (2005). Interactive problem solving: Changing political culture in the pursuit of conflict resolution. Journal of Peace Psychology, 16(4), 389–413.
Kemp, A. (2000). Dramatizing sovereignty:the construction of territorial dispute in the Israeli –Egyptian border at Taba. 19(March 1979), 315–344.
Lasensky, S. (2004). Paying for Peace: The Oslo Process and the Limits of American Foreign Aid. Middle East Journal, 58, 210–234. h
Lederhandler, E. (1989). The Road to Modern Jewish Politics: Political Tradition and Political Reconstruction in the Jewish Community of Tsarist Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mock, S., Obeidi, A., & Zeleznikow, J. (2012). A Brief Outline of the Israel-Palestinian Conflict. Group Decision and Negotiation, (April 2012), 1–18.
Rowe, N. (2011). Dance and Political Credibility: The Appropriation of Dabkeh by Zionism, Pan-Arabism, and Palestinian Nationalism Nicholas Rowe.
Copyright (c) 2024 Zainab Iqbal (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.