Peer Review Process

The Pinnacle International Journals

At The Pinnacle International Journals, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity, transparency, and research quality. All submissions to our journals undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process, ensuring that decisions are made fairly, based on the merit of the content.

1. Initial Editorial Screening

  • Once a manuscript is submitted, it is screened by the Editor-in-Chief or assigned handling editor.

  • The manuscript is checked for compliance with journal guidelines, relevance to the journal's scope, and plagiarism using industry-standard tools.

  • Manuscripts that do not meet minimum standards are rejected or returned for revision at this stage.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

  • Eligible manuscripts are assigned to two or more independent reviewers with expertise in the subject area.

  • The identities of both the reviewers and authors are kept anonymous to ensure impartiality and prevent bias.

  • Reviewers are given 2–3 weeks to evaluate the manuscript and provide detailed, constructive feedback.

3. Review Criteria

Reviewers assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:

  • Originality and significance of the research

  • Clarity and structure of the manuscript

  • Methodological rigor and appropriateness

  • Quality of data and interpretation of results

  • Relevance to the field and journal scope

  • Adherence to ethical standards

4. Reviewer Recommendations

Each reviewer will recommend one of the following:

  • Accept without revisions

  • Accept with minor revisions

  • Major revisions required

  • Reject

5. Editorial Decision

  • The editor considers the reviewers’ comments and makes a final decision.

  • In the case of conflicting reviews, a third reviewer may be consulted.

  • Authors are notified of the decision and provided with anonymized reviewer feedback.

6. Revision and Resubmission

  • If revisions are requested, authors must submit a revised manuscript along with a detailed response letter addressing all reviewer comments.

  • Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by the original reviewers or editorial board before a final decision.

7. Final Acceptance and Publication

  • Upon acceptance, the manuscript proceeds to copyediting, typesetting, and final proof approval.

  • The article is then published online under an open-access license, with a DOI assigned.


Review Timeline

  • Initial Screening: 3–5 days

  • Peer Review: 2–4 weeks

  • Revisions (if applicable): 1–2 weeks

  • Final Decision & Publication: Within 7–10 days after final approval