Self-Control, Emotion Regulation, And Goal Dynamics: An Integrative Theoretical Model Of Cognitive And Motivational Well-Being

Dr. Alejandro M. Ríos

doi:10.54640/

Authors

Dr. Alejandro M. Ríos Department of Psychology, Universidad de Salamanca, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54640/

Keywords:

Self-control, emotion regulation, goal regulation

Abstract

Understanding how individuals regulate their thoughts, emotions, and actions in pursuit of valued goals has long been a central concern across psychology, education, and behavioral economics. The present article develops an integrative theoretical account of cognitive and motivational well-being by synthesizing three major traditions represented in the existing literature: the strength model of self-control, self-determination theory–based approaches to emotion regulation, and goal regulation frameworks emphasizing action crises, disengagement, and feedback processes. Drawing exclusively on the provided references, this article advances a comprehensive conceptual model that explains how self-control resources, emotion regulation strategies, and goal-related motivational structures interact dynamically over time to shape well-being, persistence, and adaptive functioning. Particular attention is given to the distinction between integrative and suppressive emotion regulation, the conditions under which self-control succeeds or fails, and the psychological consequences of goal commitment, crisis, and disengagement. In addition, insights from diary methodologies and behavioral economic perspectives on procrastination, willpower, and strategic ignorance are incorporated to enrich the temporal and contextual sensitivity of the model. The article argues that well-being is not merely a function of goal attainment, but rather of how individuals regulate emotions, allocate self-control resources, and respond to feedback when goals become obstructed or misaligned with psychological needs. The discussion highlights theoretical implications for motivation research, addresses limitations inherent in current approaches, and outlines directions for future empirical work. By offering a unified framework, this article aims to deepen conceptual clarity and provide a robust foundation for understanding cognitive well-being as an emergent property of self-regulatory processes embedded in motivational and emotional systems.

References

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x

Benita, M. (2020). Freedom to feel: A self-determination theory account of emotion regulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, e12563. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12563

Benita, M., Benish-Weisman, M., Matos, L., & Torres, C. (2020). Integrative and suppressive emotion regulation differentially predict well-being through basic need satisfaction and frustration: A test of three countries. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09781-x

Benita, M., Levkovitz, T., & Roth, G. (2017). Integrative emotion regulation predicts adolescents' prosocial behavior through the mediation of empathy. Learning and Instruction, 50, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.004

Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030

Brandstätter, V., & Herrmann, M. (2016). Goal disengagement in emerging adulthood: The adaptive potential of action crises. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415597550

Brandstätter, V., Herrmann, M., & Schüler, J. (2013). The struggle of giving up personal goals: Affective, physiological, and cognitive consequences of an action crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1668–1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213500151

Burger, N., Charness, G., & Lynham, J. (2008). Three field experiments on procrastination and willpower.

Burger, N., & Lynham, J. (2007). Betting on weight loss and losing: Personal gambles as commitment mechanisms.

Carrillo, J. D., & Mariotti, T. (2000). Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. Review of Economic Studies, 67(3), 529–544.

Graham, S. (1994). Motivation in African Americans. Review of Educational Research, 64, 55–117.

Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187–194.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1–21.

Harding, S. J. (2025). A control theory model of cognitive well-being: The role of goal regulation and feedback mechanisms. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Development, 2(10), 1–8.

International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Development

Article Details Page