CREATING A SEMANTIC METADATA MODEL FOR HUMANITIES RESEARCH DATA
Abstract
This paper presents a novel metadata design for organizing and managing humanities research data based on the semantic structure of research literature. The proposed metadata model aims to enhance the accessibility, discoverability, and interoperability of research data by leveraging the rich, nuanced semantics embedded within humanities texts. By aligning metadata creation with the semantic structure of research literature, this design proposes a system that facilitates the categorization and cross-referencing of knowledge while ensuring that research data is easily retrievable. The paper also discusses the potential of this design in promoting efficient data sharing and collaboration within the humanities research community.
Keywords
Humanities research, metadata design, semantic structureHow to Cite
Downloads
References
Burrows T. Sharing humanities data for e-research: conceptual and technical issues. In: Thieberger N (ed.) Sustainable data from digital research: humanities perspectives on digital scholarship. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Custom Book Centre, 2011, pp. 171–185.
Van Dijk TA. Macrostructures: an interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.
Superceanu R. The rhetoric of scientific articles: a genere study. Timişoara: Orizonturi Universitare, 1998.
De Waard A, Breure L, Kircz J, et al. Modeling rhetoric in scientific publications. In: International conference on multidisciplinary information sciences and technologies, InSciT2006, Barcelona, Spain, 25–28 October 2006.
De Waarde A. A pragmatic structure for research articles. In: 2nd International conference on the pragmatic web, Tilburg, 22–23 October 2007.
Kando N. Text-level structure of research papers: implications for text-based information processing systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual BCS-IRSG colloquium on IR research, Aberdeen, 8–9 April 1997, pp. 68–81. New York: ACM.
Kando N. Text structure analysis as a tool to make retrieved documents sable. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on information retrieval with Asian languages, Taipei, November 1999, pp. 126–135. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Ko YM, Song IS. A study on the knowledge organizing system of research papers based on semantic relation of the knowledge structure. J Korean Soc Inf Manag 2011; 28(1): 145–170.
Song MS, Ko YM. A study on the metadata based on the semantic structure of the Korean studies research articles. J Korean Libr Inf Sci Soc 2015; 46(3): 277–299.
Ko YM, Seo TS, Lim TH. A study on metadata mapping for semantic interoperability. J Korean Soc Inf Manag 2007; 24(4): 223–238.
Chan M, Zeng L. Metadata interoperability and standardization: a study of methodology (part I) achieving interoperability at the schema level. D-Lib Mag 2006; 12(6), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html Crossref.
Seo TS. A guide to making data interoperable. Daejeon, South Korea: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, 2023.
ISO/IEC 11179-33. Information technology – metadata registries (MDR) – part 33: metamodel for data set registration, 2023.
Stigler J, Steiner E. GAMS – an infrastructure for the long-term preservation and publication of research data from the humanities. Mitt Ver Österr Bibl Bibl 2018; 71: 207.
Martin-Rodilla P, Gonzalez-Perez C. Metainformation scenarios in digital humanities: characterization and conceptual modelling strategies. Inf Syst 2019; 84: 29–48. Crossref. Web of Science.
Zhao F. A systematic review of Wikidata in digital humanities projects. Digit Scholarsh Humanit 2023; 38(2): 852–874. Crossref. Web of Science.
Kim J, Han Y, You W, et al. A study on the design of metadata for research data management in forestry engineering. J the Korean Soc Libr Inf Sci 2020; 54(4): 169–194.
Farnel S, Shiri A. Metadata for research data. In: DCMI’14: proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Dublin core and metadata applications, Austin, TX, 8–11 October 2017, pp. 74–82. Austin, TX: DCMI.
Gómez ND, Méndez E, Hernández-Pérez T. Social sciences and humanities research data and metadata: a perspective from thematic data repositories. Prof Inf 2016; 25(4): 545–555. Web of Science.
re3data.org – Registry of Research Data Repositories, Crossref (2012, accessed 8 October 2024).
TTAK.KO-10.0976:2017. The integrated metadata for the scientific data.
DataCite metadata schema documentation for the publication and citation of research data and other research outputs, version 4.4, 2021, https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.4/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v4.4.pdf
ARCHE. A resource centre for humanities related research in Austria, https://arche.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/browser/ (2003, accessed 25 January 2024).
Humanities Commons. Commons Open Repository Exchange, https://hcommons.org/core (2016, accessed 25 January 2024).
Korea Research Memory, https://www.krm.or.kr/ (2007, accessed 26 June 2024).
University of Michigan. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, https://www.icpsr.umich.edu (2020, accessed 25 January 2024).
UKRI. UK Data Service, https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/ (2012, accessed 25 January 2024).
An BG, Ko YM. A study on the metadata based on the semantic structure of the humanities research articles for research data. J Korean BIBLIA Soc Libr Inf Sci 2022; 33(1): 345–369.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jane Smith (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
