eISSN: 3087-4084 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Management and Business Development

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Socio-Economic Network Analysis of Cattle Trade Systems in the Lili–Camplong Livestock Market, Kupang Regency

DOI
PDF
Dr. Budi Santoso 1 , Dr. Ayu Prameswari 1 ,
4 Department of Information Systems Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
4 Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

The cattle trade system in rural livestock markets represents a complex socio-economic network shaped by interpersonal relationships, financial capital flows, and institutional arrangements. This study examines the socio-economic network of cattle trading in the Lili–Camplong Livestock Market, Kupang Regency, by integrating network-based economic perspectives and social entrepreneurship frameworks. The research adopts a qualitative interpretive approach grounded in methodological principles of mixed and qualitative research design (Cresswell, 2009). Data synthesis is derived exclusively from secondary literature focusing on socio-economic networks, social capital, and collaborative entrepreneurship systems.

Findings indicate that cattle trade in the Lili–Camplong market is sustained by multi-layered relational networks involving breeders, traders, intermediaries, and local institutions. These networks function not only as economic exchange systems but also as trust-based governance mechanisms that reduce transaction risks and market uncertainty. Social capital elements such as reciprocity, cooperation, and informal agreements significantly influence pricing mechanisms and market efficiency. However, structural inequalities, limited financial access, and asymmetrical bargaining power remain persistent challenges.

The study contributes to understanding rural livestock markets as hybrid socio-economic ecosystems where formal and informal institutions intersect. It further highlights the importance of collaborative entrepreneurship and community-based economic models in strengthening rural market resilience.

Keywords

Socio-economic network, cattle trade, livestock market

References

Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9.
Alzahrani, F. (2021). The Role of Social Entrepreneurship in the Process of Recovery from Disaster: A Systematic Literature Review During Covid-19 Era. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 5(10), 2021. www.ijebmr.com
Arshed, N., & Danson, M. (2016). Enterprise: Concepts and issues. Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.
Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4).
Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian kualitatif: komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya (Vol. 2). Kencana.
Bungin, B. (2011). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.
Cardella, G. M., Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., Monteiro, A. A., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2021). Social entrepreneurship research: Intellectual structures and future perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14).
Chatterjee, I., Cornelissen, J., & Wincent, J. (2021). Social entrepreneurship and values work: The role of practices in shaping values and negotiating change. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(1).
Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(3), 195–215.
Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 604–623.
Cresswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed methods approaches SAGE publication.
de Bruin, A., Shaw, E., & Lewis, K. V. (2017). The collaborative dynamic in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(7–8), 575–585.
Durmuş, M. E., & Ergen, Y. (2021). The experiences of classroom teachers on the homework process in teaching mathematics: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Durkin, C., & Gunn, R. (Eds.). (2016). Social entrepreneurship: A skills approach. Policy Press.
Elisabeth Sundin. (2016). Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy Article information: Journal of Enterprising Communities, 10(4), 29.
Elsafty, A., Abadir, D., & Shaarawy, A. (2020). How Does the Entrepreneurs’ Financial, Human, Social and Psychological Capitals Impact Entrepreneur’s Success? Business and Management Studies, 6(3), 55.
From Art to Social Entrepreneurship Praxis: The Collaboration Dynamics of Warung Murakabi Minggir through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 293–314.
Galkina, T., & Jack, S. (2022). The synergy of causation and effectuation in the process of entrepreneurial networking: Implications for opportunity development. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 40(5), 564–591.
Ghalwash, S., Tolba, A., & Ismail, A. (2017). What motivates social entrepreneurs to start social ventures?: An exploratory study in the context of a developing economy. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(3), 268–298.
Irwansyah, N. N. H., & Hidayah, S. (2022). Analisis Strategi Pengembangan Kewirausahaan Berbasis Komunitas Lokal Generasi Milenial Di Kota Banjarmasin. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah (Vol. 7, No. 2).
Karami, M., & Read, S. (2021). Co-creative entrepreneurship.
Kosmynin, M. (2021). Social entrepreneurship organisations and collaboration: taking stock and looking forward. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 28(2), 441–470.
Kovanen, S. (2021). Social entrepreneurship as a collaborative practice: literature review and research agenda. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(1), 97–128.
Kwong, C., Tasavori, M., & Cheung, C. W. (2017). Bricolage, collaboration and mission drift in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(7–8), 609–638.
Lin, H., Li, Y., & Zhou, L. (2022). A Consociation Model: Organization of Collective Entrepreneurship for Village Revitalization. Systems, 10(4), 1–18.
Lukiyanto, K., & Wijayaningtyas, M. (2020). Gotong Royong as social capital to overcome micro and small enterprises’ capital difficulties. Heliyon, 6(9).
Mair, Johanna. (2020). Social Entrepreneurship: Research as Disciplined Exploration. SSRN Electronic Journal.
McKeever, E., Anderson, A., & Jack, S. (2014). Entrepreneurship and mutuality: social capital in processes and practices. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5–6), 453–477.
Mignenan, V. (2021). Collective Intelligence and Entrepreneurial Resilience in the Context of Covid-19. International Business Research, 14(9), 1.
Mihas, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Muzahidul, M., Patowary, I., Javaid, T., Thi, L., Quynh, B., & Thiru, P. (2020). The Impact of The Entrepreneur’s Social networks on The Performance of The Firm During The Early Stages of Internationalization.
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97.
Olinsson, S. B. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship-Committing Theory to Practice. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 225–247.
Olmedo, L., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2022). Community-Based Social Enterprises as Actors for Neo-Endogenous Rural Development: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach. Rural Sociology, 87(4), 1191–1218.
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14.
Prasetyo, P. E., Setyadharma, A., & Kistanti, N. R. (2021). The Collaboration of Social Entrepreneurship and Institution for Sustainable Regional Development Security. Open Journal of Business and Management, 09(05), 2566–2590.
Prastowo, A. (2011). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam perspektif rancangan penelitian. Jogjakarta: Ar-ruzz media.
Pret, T., & Carter, S. (2017). The importance of ‘fitting in’: collaboration and social value creation in response to community norms and expectations. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(7–8), 639–667.
Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work? Human Relations, 70(4), 389–409.
Ratten, V. (2022). Coronavirus (covid-19) and social value co-creation. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(3–4), 222–231.
Ravn, S. (2023). Integrating qualitative research methodologies and phenomenology—using dancers’ and athletes’ experiences for phenomenological analysis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 107–127.
Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 432–451.
Ruggiano, N., & Perry, T. E. (2019). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), 81–97.
Shomoye-Olusi, A. M., Orekoya, I. O., Adepeju-Orekoya, Q. A., & Akintimehin, O. O. (2022). The role of social entrepreneurship in community recovery and development in the Post-COVID-19 pandemic period. In Springer eBooks, 293–319.
Simarmata, N., Yuniarti, K., Riyono, B., & Patria, B. (2019). The Decadence of Gotong Royong. 370, 74–79.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

11-19 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.