eISSN: 3087-4300 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Renewable, Green, and Sustainable Energy

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

THE POWER SECTOR'S DECARBONIZATION TRAJECTORY: DEVELOPING AN ELECTRICITY CLIMATE ALIGNMENT METRIC

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/ijrgse-v02i07-01
PDF
Dr. Tobias Müller 1 , Dr. Chen Li 1 ,
4 Institute for Renewable Energy Systems, Technical University of Munich, Germany
4 Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, China

Abstract

The global power sector is pivotal to achieving climate targets, yet its decarbonization presents complex challenges, including the risk of stranded assets. This article proposes an Electricity Climate Alignment Metric (ECAM) to comprehensively assess and track global progress towards a low-carbon electricity future. The ECAM integrates key components such as carbon intensity, share of low-carbon electricity, fossil fuel plant profiles, committed emissions, stranded asset risk, and investment flows. Anticipated results highlight a multi-speed transition and pinpoint regions vulnerable to stranded assets due to existing fossil fuel infrastructure. The discussion emphasizes the profound policy and investment implications, advocating for accelerated renewable deployment, managed fossil fuel phase-out, robust carbon pricing, and international cooperation. The ECAM aims to provide quantifiable insights for policymakers and investors to navigate the transition, manage financial risks, and accelerate the shift to a climate-compatible electricity system.

Keywords

Electricity, Decarbonization, Climate Change

References

Patlitzianas, Konstantinos D., et al., 2008. Sustainable energy policy indicators: review and recommendations. Renew. Energy 33.5, 966–973.
Gunnarsdóttir, Ingunn, et al., 2020. Review of indicators for sustainable energy development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 133, 110294.
Kruyt, Bert, et al., 2009. Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy 37.6, 2166–2181.
Krishnan, Mekala, et al. The net-zero transition: What it would cost, what it could bring. (2022).
Carley, Sanya, Konisky, David M., 2020. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 5.8, 569–577.
IEA, World Energy Investment 2020, IEA, Paris 〈https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2020〉 (2020).
Mitchell, Tom, Maxwell, Simon, 2010. Defining climate compatible development. CDKN Policy Brief. 2010, 1–6.
IEA, World Energy Outlook 2013, IEA, Paris 〈https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2013〉 (2013).
Green, Jemma, Newman, Peter, 2017. Disruptive innovation, stranded assets and forecasting: the rise and rise of renewable energy. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 7.2, 169–187.
Markard, Jochen, 2018. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nat. Energy 3.8, 628–633.
Curtin, J., et al., 2019. Quantifying stranding risk for fossil fuel assets and implications for renewable energy investment: a review of the literature. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 116, 109402.
Robins, Nick. Integrating Environmental Risks into Asset Valuations: The potential for stranded assets and the implications for long-term investors. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: http://www. iisd. org/publications/integrating-environmental-risks-assetvaluations-potential-strandedassets (2014).
Van der, Ploeg, Frederick, Rezai, Armon, 2020. Stranded assets in the transition to a carbon-free economy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12, 281–298.
Jakob, Michael, Hilaire, J.érôme, 2015. Unburnable fossil-fuel reserves. Nat. 517. 7533 150–151.
Bos, Kyra, Gupta, Joyeeta, 2018. Climate change: the risks of stranded fossil fuel assets and resources to the developing world. Third World Q. 39.3, 436–453.
Graaf, Van de, 2018. Thijs. Battling for a shrinking market: oil producers, the renewables revolution, and the risk of stranded assets. The geopolitics of renewables. Springer, Cham, pp. 97–121.
Tong, Dan, et al., 2019. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardisee 1.5C climate target. Nature 572.7769, 373–377.
Cahen-Fourot, Louison, et al. Capital stranding cascades: The impact of decarbonisation on productive asset utilisation. AFD Research Papers 204 (2021): 1-32.
Caldecott, Ben, et al., 2021. Stranded assets: environmental drivers, societal challenges, and supervisory responses. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46.1.
Rempel, Arthur, Gupta, Joyeeta, 2021. Fossil fuels, stranded assets and COVID-19: Imagining an inclusive & transformative recovery. World Dev. 146, 105608.
Ansari, Dawud, Holz, Franziska, 2020. Between stranded assets and green transformation: Fossil-fuel-producing developing countries towards 2055. World Dev. 130, 104947.
Caldecott, Ben, et al., 2020. Stranded assets: A climate risk challenge. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC.
Lu, Yangsiyu, et al., 2022. Plant conversions and abatement technologies cannot prevent stranding of power plant assets in 2° C scenarios. Nat. Commun. 13.1, 1–11.
Fofrich, Robert, et al., 2020. Early retirement of power plants in climate mitigation scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 15.9, 094064.
Johnson, Nils, et al., 2015. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 89–102.
Binsted, Matthew, et al., 2020. Stranded asset implications of the Paris Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environ. Res. Lett. 15.4, 044026.
Hickey, Conor, et al., 2021. Can European electric utilities manage asset impairments arising from net zero carbon targets? J. Corp. Financ. 70, 102075.
Saygin, Deger, et al., 2019. Power sector asset stranding effects of climate policies. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ., Plan., Policy 14.4, 99–124.
Kefford, Benjamin M., et al., 2018. The early retirement challenge for fossil fuel power plants in deep decarbonisation scenarios. Energy Policy 119, 294–306.
Pfeiffer, Alexander, et al., 2016. The 2C capital stock for electricity generation: Committed cumulative carbon emissions from the electricity generation sector and the transition to a green economy. Appl. Energy 179, 1395–1408.
Pfeiffer, Alexander, et al., 2018. Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement. Environ. Res. Lett. 13.5, 054019.
Jaffe, Amy Myers, 2020. Stranded assets and sovereign states. Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev. 251, R25–R36.
Sovacool, Benjamin K., Scarpaci, Joseph, 2016. Energy justice and the contested petroleum politics of stranded assets: Policy insights from the Yasuní-ITT Initiative in Ecuador. Energy Policy 95, 158–171.
Spavieri, Simonetta. A First Estimation of Fossil-Fuel Stranded Assets in Venezuela Due to Climate Change Mitigation.
Oshiro, Ken, Fujimori, Shinichiro, 2021. Stranded investment associated with rapid energy system changes under the mid-century strategy in Japan. Sustain. Sci. 16.2, 477–487.
Malik, Aman, et al., 2020. Reducing stranded assets through early action in the Indian power sector. Environ. Res. Lett. 15.9, 094091.
Hughes, Llewelyn, Downie, Christian, 2021. Bilateral finance organisations and stranded asset risk in coal: the case of Japan. Clim. Policy 1–16.
Zhang, Haonan, Xingping, Zhang, Jiahai, Yuan, 2020. Transition of China's power sector consistent with Paris Agreement into 2050: Pathways and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 132, 110102.
ENERDATA. Power plan tracker (〈https://enerdata.net/research/power-plant-database.html〉) (2020).
S&P Global Market Intelligence. World Electric Power Plants Database. 〈https://www.spglobal.com/platts/zh/products-services/electric-power/worldelectric-power-plants-database〉. (2020).
World Resources Institute. Global Power Plant Database. 〈https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase〉. (2019).
Endcoal. Global Coal Plant Tracker. 〈https://endcoal.org/global-coal-planttracker/〉. (2019).
IEA. World Energy Outlook. (2021).
Bertram, Chris, et al. NGFS Climate Scenarios Database: Technical Documentation. (2020).
Bauer, Nico, Brecha, Robert J., Luderer, Gunnar, 2012. Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109.42, 16805–16810.
Bauer, Nico, et al., 2016. Assessing global fossil fuel availability in a scenario framework. Energy 111, 580–592.
Bertram, Christoph, et al., 2015. Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach. Nat. Clim. Change 5.3, 235–239.
Creutzig, Felix, et al., 2017. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nat. Energy 2.9, 1–9.
Calvin, Katherine, et al., 2019. GCAM v5. 1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems. Geosci. Model Dev. 12.2, 677–698.
Krey, V., et al. MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM Documentation-2020 release. (2020).
Luderer, Gunnar, et al. Description of the REMIND model (Version 1.6). (2.
Schwanitz, Valeria Jana, 2013. Evaluating integrated assessment models of global climate change. Environ. Model. Softw. 50, 120–131.
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. 2022.
IRENA. Stranded Assets and Renewables: How the Energy Transition Affects the Value of Energy Reserves, Buildings and Capital Stock. 2017.
Statistics Iceland. Statistics Iceland: energy. 2019.
Ragnarsson, Birgir Freyr, et al., 2015. Levelized cost of energy analysis of a wind power generation system at burfell in iceland. Energies 8.9, 9464–9485.
Rodríguez-Monroy, Carlos, Mármol-Acitores, Gloria, Nilsson-Cifuentes, Gabriel, 2018. Electricity generation in Chile using non-conventional renewable energy sources–A focus on biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 937–945.
Das, N.K., et al., 2020. Present energy scenario and future energy mix of Bangladesh. Energy Strategy Rev. 32, 100576.
Amin, Sakib Bin, et al., 2022. Energy security and sustainable energy policy in Bangladesh: From the lens of 4As framework. Energy Policy 161, 112719.
Islam, Shafeenul, Brigadier General Md, 2015. REVISITING THE CASE OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT IN THE CONTEXT OF BANGLADESH. NDC E-J. 14.2, 31–50.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Similar Articles

11-18 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.