Advancing Circular Business Models in Construction: An Integrative Framework for Sustainable Value Creation
Keywords:
Circular economy, Circular business models, Construction industryAbstract
The transition from linear to circular economy paradigms necessitates rethinking business models (BMs), particularly in resource-intensive sectors such as construction. This study synthesizes extant literature across circular economy (CE) business models (CBMs), institutional frameworks, value‑network dynamics, and product-service system (PSS) strategies to propose an integrative conceptual framework for advancing CE adoption in construction. By systematically reviewing and thematically analyzing major contributions—including case studies on reverse logistics, life extension policies, and CE in construction and port ecosystems—this paper derives key drivers, barriers, enabling mechanisms, and governance conditions. The resulting framework posits three interdependent dimensions: (1) Value‑Network Orchestration, (2) Institutional and Policy Alignment, and (3) Product‑Service System & Life‑Extension Strategies. Within this tripartite structure, the study identifies critical enablers (collaborative networks, sustainable public procurement, supportive legislation, life‑extension incentives) and obstacles (fragmented supply chains, regulatory misalignment, economic disincentives, behavioral inertia). The framework underscores the necessity of dynamic stakeholder coordination and systemic shifts beyond individual firms. Implications for researchers, policymakers, and industry practitioners are elaborated, alongside propositions for empirical validation and longitudinal assessment. The article contributes a robust theorization of CBM deployment in construction, bridging gaps between abstract CE principles and actionable industry strategies.
References
Asgari, A., & Asgari, R. (2021). How circular economy transforms business models in a transition towards circular ecosystem: the barriers and incentives. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.020
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
de Langen, P. W., Sornn‑Friese, H., & Hallworth, J. (2020). The Role of Port Development Companies in Transitioning the Port Business Ecosystem; The Case of Port of Amsterdam’s Circular Activities. Sustainability, 12, 4397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114397
Hina, M., Chauhan, C., Kaur, P., Kraus, S., & Dhir, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: Where we are now, and where we are heading. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049
Ho, C.-H., Böhm, S., & Monciardini, D. (2022). The collaborative and contested interplay between business and civil society in circular economy transitions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2714–2727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3001
Iyer‑Raniga, U. (2019). Using the ReSOLVE framework for circularity in the building and construction industry in emerging markets. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 294, 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/294/1/012002
Kanther, S. D. (2025). Integrating circular business models in construction: A framework for design and planning to enhance sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability and Innovation in Engineering, 3, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.56830/IJSIE202502
Levänen, J., Lyytinen, T., & Gatica, S. (2018). Modelling the Interplay Between Institutions and Circular Economy Business Models: A Case Study of Battery Recycling in Finland and Chile. Ecological Economics, 154, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.018
Mishra, J. L., Chiwenga, K. D., & Ali, K. (2019). Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country. Management Decision, 59(8), 784–1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1111
Milios, L. (2021). Overarching policy framework for product life extension in a circular economy—A bottom-up business perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(4), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1927
Osobajo, O. A., Oke, A., Omotayo, T., & Obi, L. I. (2022). A systematic review of circular economy research in the construction industry. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11, 39–64.
Ossio, F., Salinas, C., & Hernández, H. (2023). Circular economy in the built environment: A systematic literature review and definition of the circular construction concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137738.
Otasowie, O. K., Aigbavboa, C. O., Oke, A. E., & Adekunle, P. (2024). Mapping out focus for circular economy business models (CEBMs) research in construction sector studies—A bibliometric approach. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.
Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Reim, W. (2019). Reviewing literature on digitalization, business model innovation, and sustainable industry: Past achievements and future promises. Sustainability, 11, 391.
Pedersen, S., Clausen, C., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2022). Navigating value networks to co‑create sustainable business models: An actionable staging approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3127
Reim, W., Parida, V., & Örtqvist, D. (2015). Product-Service Systems (PSS) business models and tactics—A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 61–75.
Rosato, P. F., Caputo, A., Valente, D., & Pizzi, S. (2021). 2030 Agenda and sustainable business models in tourism: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 121, 106978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106978
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Sage Publications.
Stahel, W. (1981). The product‑life factor. In S. G. Orr (Ed.), An Inquiry into the Nature of Sustainable Societies: The Role of the Private Sector (pp. 72–96). HARC.
Starostka‑Patyk, M., Zawada, M., Pabian, A., & Abed, M. (2013). Barriers to reverse logistics implementation in enterprises. In International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAdLT.2013.6568510
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.
Teece, D. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2‑3), 172–194.
Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260.
Tukker, A. (2015). Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76–91.
Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006a). New Business for Old Europe: Product‑Service Development, Competitiveness and Sustainability. Greenleaf Publishing.
Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006b). Product-services as a research field: past, present and future: reflections from a decade of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1552–1556.
Yu, Y., Junjan, V., Yazan, D. M., & Iacob, M. E. (2022). A systematic literature review on Circular Economy implementation in the construction industry: A policy-making perspective. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 183, 106359.
Zucchella, A., & Previtali, P. (2019). Circular business models for sustainable development: A “waste is food” restorative ecosystem. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 274–285.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John R. Harrison (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.