Augmenting the Modern Security Operations Center: A Multidimensional Analysis of Generative AI, Automation, and Next-Generation Computing Architectures
Keywords:
Security Operations Center (SOC), Generative AI, Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR), Neuromorphic ComputingAbstract
Background: The contemporary Security Operations Center (SOC) faces an existential crisis driven by exponential data growth and sophisticated, multi-vector cyber threats. Traditional Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems are increasingly insufficient, leading to alert fatigue and delayed response times.
Methods: This study proposes a novel "Cognitive SOC" framework that integrates Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), and emerging computing architectures. We employ a comparative analysis utilizing recent econometric syntheses and productivity studies to model the efficiency gains of AI-augmented security analysts. Furthermore, we evaluate the theoretical integration of neuromorphic computing and quantum algorithms for edge-based threat detection.
Results: Our analysis indicates that GenAI integration is associated with a significant reduction in investigation timelines, mirroring productivity gains observed in software development. Theoretical modeling suggests that neuromorphic architectures could reduce transaction processing latency in edge databases to near-zero levels, enhancing real-time anomaly detection.
Conclusion: The transition to an AI-driven, potentially quantum-ready SOC is not merely an upgrade but a necessary evolution. While automation offers substantial efficiency improvements, it introduces new risks regarding privacy and operator complacency that must be managed through rigorous governance.
References
Prassanna R Rajgopal. (2025). AI-optimized SOC playbook for Ransomware Investigation. International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 5(02), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijdsml-05-02-04
Constantin, L. (2020, December 15). SolarWinds attack explained: And why it was so hard to detect. CSO Online.
Check Point (n.d.). What is a security operations
center (SOC)? Retrieved October 8, 2022.
Sarker, I. H. (2022). Machine learning for intelligent data analysis and automation in cybersecurity: Current and future prospects. Ann. Data. Sci., 10:1473–1498.
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2024). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, March 2024.
Peng, S., Kalliamvakou, E., Cihon, P., & Demirer,
M. (2023). The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from Github Copilot. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.06590.
Khurana, R. (2022). Applications of quantum computing in telecom e-commerce: Analysis of qkd, qaoa, and qml for data encryption, speed optimization, and ai-driven customer experience. Quarterly Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovations, 7(9), 1-15.
Murthy, P., & Mehra, A. (2021). Exploring neuromorphic computing for ultra-low latency transaction processing in edge database architectures. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 8(1), 25–26.
Cobb, M. (n.d.). SIEM vs. SOAR vs. XDR:
Evaluate the differences. TechTarget. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
Collins, J., Schneider, M., & Shoard, P. (2021, October 19). SOC model guide. Gartner, ID G00754096.
Crowley, C. & Pescatore, J. (2018). The definition of SOC-cess? SANS 2018 Security Operations Center Survey, SANS Institute.
Sarker, I.H., Furhad M. Hasan, and Ra Nowrozy. (2021). Ai-driven cybersecurity: an overview, security intelligence modeling and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3): 1–18.
Microsoft. Microsoft copilot for security frequently asked questions, 2024.
Morgan, P. L., Collins, E. I. M., Spiliotopoulos, T., Greeno, D. J., & Jones, D. M. (2022). Reducing risk to security and privacy in the selection of trigger- action rules: Implicit vs. explicit priming for domestic smart devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 168:102902.
Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A., & Poe,
J. (2023). What’s trending in difference-in- differences? a synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2):2218–2244.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Elias V. Thorne (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.