eISSN: 3087-4076 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Development

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Scoring System and Interpretation Guidelines for the Self-Comforting and Coping Scale (SCCS)

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/ijsshd-v02i04-01
PDF
Kennedy Oberhiri Obohwemu 1 ,
4 PhD, Department of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, GBS Partnership, Birmingham, United Kingdom; and PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

This paper presents a follow-up to the initial development of the Self-Comforting and Coping Scale (SCCS), offering a detailed framework for its scoring system, conversion guidelines, and interpretive strategies. The SCCS is a theory-driven, psychometrically grounded instrument designed to assess individuals’ self-comforting behaviours and coping responses to stress. While the original paper introduced the conceptual basis and structural components of the SCCS, the current study expands its utility by establishing a standardized scoring procedure that enhances reliability, interpretability, and applicability in both research and clinical contexts. The paper outlines how individual items are scored using a modified Likert scale and describes procedures for reverse scoring and handling missing data. Domain-level scores and an overall SCCS score are derived from item responses, with conversion to a 0–100 scale using a calibrated transformation chart to accommodate minor item omissions. The scoring system is designed to be flexible yet robust, allowing for its use across diverse settings, including longitudinal and intervention studies. Guidelines for interpreting high and low scores across domains help identify emotional resilience, coping strengths, and areas requiring intervention. Importantly, the scoring system facilitates the meaningful application of the SCCS by supporting early identification of individuals at risk for poor stress management, informing targeted interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy and mindfulness-based programs. This paper thus represents a crucial step in operationalizing the SCCS for broader scientific and practical use, advancing the empirical study of self-comforting as a distinct and measurable construct in mental health research.

Keywords

Self-comforting Behaviours, Coping Strategies, Psychometric Scoring, SCCS, Emotional Resilience, SCCT, Stress Management

References

Aliche, C.J., (2023). The mediating role of positive reappraisal and self-compassion on the relationship between mindfulness and posttraumatic growth in patients with cancer. South African Journal of Psychology, 53(1), pp.111-123.
Beck, J.S., 2020. Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Publications.
Boateng, G.O., Neilands, T.B., Frongillo, E.A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H.R. and Young, S.L., 2018. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in public health, 6, p.149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
Clark, L.A. and Watson, D., 2019. Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological assessment, 31(12), p.1412.
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
Cudeck, R. and Browne, M.W., 1983. Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate behavioral research, 18(2), pp.147-167.
Davis, M. H. (2017). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Routledge.
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Freire, C., FerradĂĄs, M.D.M., Valle, A., NĂșñez, J.C. and Vallejo, G., (2016). Profiles of psychological well-being and coping strategies among university students. Frontiers in psychology, 7, p.1554.
Gilbert, P., (2010). Compassion focused therapy: Distinctive features. Routledge.
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S. and Walach, H., (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of psychosomatic research, 57(1), pp.35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00573-7
Kabat-Zinn, J., (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg016
Kavčič, T., Avsec, A. and Kocjan, G.Z., (2022). Coping profiles and their association with psychological functioning: A latent profile analysis of coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, p.111287.
Keng, S.L., Smoski, M.J. and Robins, C.J., (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical psychology review, 31(6), pp.1041-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006
Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
Little, R.J. and Rubin, D.B., 2019. Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons.
Moreno-Montero, E., FerradĂĄs, M.D.M. and Freire, C., (2024). Personal Resources for Psychological Well-Being in University Students: The Roles of Psychological Capital and Coping Strategies. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(10), pp.2686-2701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14100177
Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
Obohwemu, K.O., (2024). Protocol for a systematic review of self-comforting behaviours across theoretical frameworks: Examining patterns, mechanisms, and socio-cultural influences over 50 years. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals, 4(06), pp.30-39.
Obohwemu, K.O., Yakpir, G.M, Koretaine, S., et al., (2024). Self-Comforting Behaviours across Theoretical Frameworks: A 50-Year Systematic Review of Patterns, Mechanisms, and Socio-Cultural Influences. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 6(12), pp.51-177.
Obohwemu, K., (2025). Theory and psychometric development of the Self-Comforting and Coping Scale (SCCS): A novel measure of self-comforting behaviors. Global Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), pp.6-22.
Schafer, J.L. and Graham, J.W., (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological methods, 7(2), p.147.
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.
Zhang, S., Rehman, S., Zhao, Y. et al. Exploring the interplay of academic stress, motivation, emotional intelligence, and mindfulness in higher education: a longitudinal cross-lagged panel model approach. BMC Psychol 12, 732 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02284-6.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Similar Articles

21-26 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.