eISSN: 3087-4084 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Management and Business Development

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Strategic Environmental Analysis in the Automobile Industry: The Role of External Forces in Shaping Operations

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmbd-v03i02-02
pdf
Syeda Faiza Sogra 1 ORCID iD , Syeda Morsheda Sogra 1 ORCID iD , Tina Puri 1 , Kennedy Oberhiri Obohwemu 1 ORCID iD , Ibiangake Friday Ndioho 1 , Charles Leyman Kachitsa 1 , Oladipo Vincent Akinmade 1 ORCID iD , Oluwafemi Emmanuel Ooju 1 ORCID iD , Festus Ituah 1 ORCID iD , Jalaleddin Kazemi Fard 1 ORCID iD , Okuma Oke Deborah 1 , Obioma Chidumaga Aririsukwu 1 ,
4 MSc,Department of Business Management, Scholars School System, Leeds Trinity University Partnership, Birmingham Campus, United Kingdom.
4 MSc,Department of Business Management, Scholars School System, Leeds Trinity University Partnership, Birmingham Campus, United Kingdom.
4 MBA,Department of Business Management, Scholars School System, Leeds Trinity University Partnership, Birmingham Campus, United Kingdom
4 PhD,Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4 PhD,Department of Health and Care Management, Arden University, Manchester, United Kingdom; and and Department of Interdisciplinary Studies & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 PhD,Faculty of Business Management and Enterprise, Leeds Trinity University, GBS Partnership, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4 MPH,Digital Health and Rights Project (Center for Interdisciplinary Methodologies, CIM), University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4 MSc,World Health Organization, Abuja, Nigeria; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4 PhD,School of Health and Sports Science, Regent College, London, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4 MSc,Department of Business Management, Scholars School System, Leeds Trinity University Partnership, Manchester Campus, United Kingdom.
4 MA,Department of Human Resource Management, Teeside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4 MBBS,Department of Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center, Abuja, Nigeria; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

The rapid global shift towards electric vehicles has altered the competitive and operational landscape of the automobile industry in profound ways. Firms now operate in an environment shaped by regulatory pressure, technological acceleration, geopolitical uncertainty, and shifting consumer expectations. This conceptual paper examines how external environmental forces influence business operations within the electric vehicle segment, with a particular focus on Tesla, Ford, and Volkswagen. Contingency theory provides the foundation for the analysis, supported by the integration of PESTEL analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, and Key Success Factors. These frameworks allow for a detailed exploration of how political, economic, technological, social, environmental, and competitive conditions shape organisational choices.

The discussion highlights how external forces influence manufacturing systems, supply chain structures, human resource practices, financial performance, and technological strategies. Brexit, exchange rate volatility, regulatory changes, and the transition towards zero emission vehicles emerge as especially significant influences on operational decision making. Each firm demonstrates a distinct pattern of response shaped by its legacy systems, strategic priorities, and technological capabilities. Tesla’s vertically integrated model, Ford’s restructuring efforts, and Volkswagen’s large-scale electrification strategy illustrate the varied ways in which organisations align internal capabilities with external demands.

The paper argues that effective organisational responses depend on the fit between environmental conditions and internal structures, reinforcing the relevance of contingency theory for understanding operational effectiveness in the evolving electric vehicle industry. The analysis contributes to ongoing debates on strategic alignment, technological transformation, and the future of mobility, offering insights for scholars and practitioners seeking to understand how firms navigate complex and fast changing environments.

Keywords

Electric vehicles, contingency theory, organisational adaptation, external environment

References

📄 Adamkasi (2023) PESTLE Analysis – The Electric Vehicle (EV) Industry | Free PESTEL Analysis, Pestle. Available at: https://freepestelanalysis.com/pestle-analysis-of-the-electric-vehicle-ev-industry/.
📄 Alves, M. W. F. M., Jabbour, A. B. L. S., Kannan, D., & Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J. (2017). Contingency theory, climate change, and low carbon operations management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0311
📄 Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
📄 Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Tavistock.
📄 CBI Economics & Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit. (2024). Exploring what electrification could mean for the UK’s automotive industry. https://www.cbi.org.uk/media/qoxp3pn4/cbi-economics-eciu-ev-sector-report-2024.pdf
📄 Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson.
📄 Desklib. (2023). Electric vehicles: Global business environment report. https://desklib.com/study-documents/electric-vehicles-analysis/
📄 Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229249
📄 Du, J., Liu, X., Shepotylo, O., & Shi, Y. (2024). Unbound: UK trade post Brexit. Aston University. https://www.aston.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Full%20Report.pdf
📄 Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
📄 Fedotov, P. (2023). Critical analysis of the electric vehicle industry: Five forces and strategic action fields. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, University of Warwick. https://exchanges.warwick.ac.uk/index.php/exchanges/article/download/362/954/5871
📄 Fine, C. H. (1998). Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Perseus Books.
📄 Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1984) Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095567
📄 Henry, I. (2024). Trade policy and the production of electric vehicles (Briefing Paper 82). UK Trade Policy Observatory. https://www.uktpo.org/wp-content/uploads/Publications/Briefing-Papers/UKTPO-2024-BP-82.pdf
📄 International Energy Agency. (2024). Global EV outlook 2024: Trends in electric cars. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024/trends-in-electric-cars, (Accessed: 10 January 2026)
📄 Jagani, S., Marsillac, E., & Hong, P. (2024). The electric vehicle supply chain ecosystem: Changing roles of automotive suppliers. Sustainability, 16(4), 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041570
📄 Karthikeyan, V., Kirubakaran, G., & Varun Prakash, R. (2024). The rise of electric vehicles: 2023 status and future directions. In Energy efficient vehicles (pp. 26–48). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003464556-10
📄 Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
📄 Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston.
📄 Nassou, Y., & Bennani, Z. (2024). Contingency theory in management: Conceptual phases and strategic link with performance measurement systems. European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(3).16
📄 Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors. Free Press.
📄 Sharanabasappa, & Soumya, S. (2023). A strategic examination of the electric vehicle industry: Opportunities and challenges for Tesla’s continued dominance. Journal of Scientific Research and Technology, 2(5), 1–15. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/31eb/226f8df47e2eb0d2bd59243f6fba93025df6.pdf
📄 Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
📄 Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148
📄 Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
📄 van Wieringen, K. (2024). The future of European electric vehicles. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2024/762873/EPRS_IDA(2024)762873_EN.pdf, (Accessed: 10 January 2026)
📄 Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496720

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.