eISSN: 3087-4084 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Management and Business Development

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

End-to-End Planning as a Tool for Synchronizing Participants in a Large Project

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmbd-v03i09-05
PDF
Nikolaev Denis 1 ,
4 Project manager, hh.ru Dubai, UAE

Abstract

This study examines through planning (also referred to as end-to-end planning) as a structural mechanism for achieving systematic coordination among multiple participants in large and complex projects. Despite decades of methodological advancement in project management, the failure rate of large-scale initiatives remains persistently high: only 35% of projects worldwide meet all goals and timelines according to PMI (2025), and 78% of large projects experience schedule overruns. The research applies a systematic literature review combined with comparative case analysis to identify coordination failure patterns and evaluate how through planning resolves them by integrating Integrated Master Schedules, Program Increment Planning, cross-functional cadence systems, and project resource coordination into a single cohesive framework. Drawing on cases from the technology, infrastructure, and public sectors, the study proposes the Synchronized End-to-End Planning Architecture (SEPA), a five-layer operational framework mapping strategic objectives to team-level execution. The findings confirm the hypothesis that through planning, when implemented as a deliberate coordination architecture rather than a scheduling exercise, significantly reduces misalignment between project participants across all lifecycle phases. Project managers, PMOs, functional leads, and senior leadership in organizations managing distributed multi-team initiatives will find the framework practically applicable.

Keywords

Through planning, End-to-End planning, Project synchronization, Integrated master schedule, Stakeholder coordination, Large-scale project management, Cross-functional team alignment, Project resource coordination, Program increment Planning, Project coordination architecture

References

Project Management Institute. (2025). Pulse of the Profession® 2025: Boosting business acumen. Retrieved January 20, 2026, from https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse_of_the_profession_2025-1.pdf
McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved January 28, 2026, from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/operations/our%20insights/reinventing%20construction%20through%20a%20productivity%20revolution/mgi-reinventing-construction-a-route-to-higher-productivity-full-report.pdf
Brigden, B. (2026, May 28). Cross-functional team management: A delivery leader's guide to making it actually work. Teamwork.com. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://www.teamwork.com/blog/cross-functional-team-management/
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (2024, October). Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integration Master Schedule (IMS) preparation and use guide (May 2023, incorporating Change 1, October 2024). U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved February 12, 2026, from https://www.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IMP-IMS-Guide-May2023-C1-Oct2024.pdf
Berntzen, M., Stray, V., & Moe, N. B. (2021). Coordination strategies: Managing inter-team coordination challenges in large-scale agile. In P. Gregory, C. Lassenius, X. Wang, & P. Kruchten (Eds.), Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 419, pp. 140–156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_9
Nikolaev, D. A. (2026). Adapting the project metrics system to the stages of its life cycle: A methodological approach. Vestnik Nauki, 7(100), 107–117. DOI 10.24412/2712-8849-2026-7100-107-117.
Nikolaev, D. A. (2025). Kanban as a tool for HR process development: From recruitment to onboarding and employee motivation [In Russian]. In I. I. Antonova (Ed.), Effective management systems: Quality. Bioeconomy. Human and technological sovereignty: Proceedings of the XII International Scientific and Practical Forum (pp. XXX–XXX). Poznanie Publishing House, Kazan Innovation University. https://doi.org/10.21202/978-5-8399-0863-5_318
Zani, C. M., Denicol, J., & Broyd, T. (2024). The four coordination roles of clients when designing megaproject organizations. Project Management Journal, 55(5), 558–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241248033
Hu, Z., Wu, G., & Zhang, W. (2024). Performance improvement in megaprojects through project network characteristics and transactive memory systems. Project Management Journal, 55(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231219982
ProProfs Editorial Team. (2026, July 5). Project management statistics & trends for 2026: The future of projects. ProProfs Project. Retrieved July 20, 2026, from https://www.proprofsproject.com/blog/project-management-statistics/
Atlassian. (n.d.). What is an integrated master schedule? Retrieved April 9, 2026, from https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/integrated-master-schedule
Hidalgo, A. (2025, June 25). What is an integrated master schedule & how to develop one. Mastt. Retrieved July 2, 2026, from https://www.mastt.com/blogs/integrated-master-schedule
Sanyaolu, T. O., Adeleke, A. G., Efunniyi, C. P., Akwawa, L. A., & Azubuko, C. F. (2023). Stakeholder management in IT development projects: Balancing expectations and deliverables. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 5(12), 1239–1255. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v5i12.1535
Nikolaev, D. A. (2025). A methodological approach to developing team performance metrics in IT companies. Ekonomika i Upravlenie: Problemy, Resheniya, 2(11), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.11.02.006
Zani, C. M., Denicol, J., & Broyd, T. (2024). Organisation design in megaprojects: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 42(6), Article 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102634
Servranckx, T., Coelho, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2024). Project management and scheduling 2022. Annals of Operations Research, 338(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05971-0
Pavez, I., Gómez, H., Liu, C., & González, V. A. (2022). Measuring project team performance: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Project Management, 40(8), 951–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.11.001
Ramadhan, J. S., & Waty, M. (2025). Impact of change orders on cost overruns and delays in large-scale construction projects. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(1), 20291–20299. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9449
Dingsøyr, T., Bjørnson, F. O., Schrof, J., & Sporsem, T. (2023). A longitudinal explanatory case study of coordination in a very large development programme: The impact of transitioning from a first- to a second-generation large-scale agile development method. Empirical Software Engineering, 28, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10230-6
Ottaviani, F. M., De Marco, A., Narbaev, T., & Rebuglio, M. (2024). Improving project estimates at completion through progress-based performance factors. Buildings, 14(3), Article 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030643
Eckes-Kondak, M., & Dajda, J. (2025). The IT project lifecycle in R&D: An adaptive approach to project management. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 216, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.216.5

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 59

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.