Open Access

Designing Low-Latency Web APIs for High-Transaction Distributed Systems: Architectural Strategies, Performance Trade-Offs, and Emerging Paradigms

4 Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Abstract

The exponential growth of digital platforms, financial technologies, real-time analytics, and cloud-native applications has intensified the demand for low-latency Web Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) capable of sustaining extremely high transaction volumes without compromising reliability, security, or consistency. As modern systems increasingly operate across geographically distributed cloud and edge environments, latency has emerged as a critical determinant of user experience, system scalability, and economic competitiveness. This research article presents an extensive and theoretically grounded investigation into the design and benchmarking of low-latency Web APIs in high-transaction systems, synthesizing architectural principles, infrastructural considerations, and performance optimization strategies derived strictly from contemporary scholarly literature. Central to this inquiry is the analytical integration of recent benchmarking frameworks for low-latency APIs in transaction-intensive environments, as articulated by Valiveti (2025), whose work provides a foundational lens for evaluating latency-sensitive system behavior under real-world load conditions. Building upon this foundation, the article situates low-latency API design within broader discourses on cloud computing, edge computing, redundancy-based optimization, data integrity, compliance, and security. The methodology adopts a qualitative, design-oriented research approach that critically examines architectural patterns, latency reduction techniques, and system-level trade-offs reported in the literature, while also addressing methodological constraints inherent in benchmarking distributed systems. The results section offers a descriptive interpretation of observed performance tendencies, emphasizing the interplay between redundancy, decentralization, and protocol efficiency. The discussion advances a deep theoretical analysis that reconciles competing scholarly perspectives on latency minimization, highlights unresolved tensions between consistency and responsiveness, and outlines future research trajectories in the context of emerging regulatory and technological landscapes. By delivering a comprehensive, publication-ready synthesis, this article contributes a nuanced understanding of how low-latency Web APIs can be systematically designed, evaluated, and evolved to meet the demands of high-transaction distributed systems.

Keywords

References

📄 Cloud-Based Compliance Systems: Architecture and Security Challenges. (2025). International IT Journal of Research, ISSN: 3007-6706, 3(1), 24–33. https://itjournal.org/index.php/itjournal/article/view/93
📄 Vulimiri, A., Godfrey, P. B., Mittal, R., Sherry, J., Ratnasamy, S., and Shenker, S. (2013). Low latency via redundancy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.3707. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.3707
📄 Gangani, C. M. (2020). Data Privacy Challenges in Cloud Solutions for IT and Healthcare. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 7(4), 460–469. https://ijsrst.com/IJSRST2293194
📄 Sharma, P. (2024). Techniques for reducing latency in cloud-based networks: A comprehensive study. Journal of Innovative Technologies, 7(1). https://academicpinnacle.com/index.php/JIT/article/view/138
📄 Valiveti, S. S. (2025). Low-Latency Web APIs in High-Transaction Systems: Design and Benchmarking. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3646
📄 Sonbol, K., Ozkasap, O., Al-Oqily, I., and Aloqaily, M. (2020). EdgeKV: Decentralized, scalable, and consistent storage for the edge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15594. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.15594
📄 Patel, N., and Choudhury, L. (2024). Techniques for reducing latency in cloud-based networks: A comprehensive study. Baltic Multidisciplinary Research Letters Journal, 7(1). https://www.bmrlj.com/index.php/Baltic/article/view/41
📄 Okwuibe, J., Liyanage, M., Ahmad, I., and Ylianttila, M. (2018). Cloud and MEC security. In Editor First Initial. Editor Last Name (Ed.), Book Title (pp. xxx–xxx). Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119293071.ch16
📄 AI in Insurance: Enhancing Fraud Detection and Risk Assessment. (2024). International IT Journal of Research, ISSN: 3007-6706, 2(4), 226–236. https://itjournal.org/index.php/itjournal/article/view/91
📄 Malekimajd, M., Movaghar, A., and Hosseinimotlagh, S. (2015). Minimizing latency in geo-distributed clouds. The Journal of Supercomputing, 71, 4423–4445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1538-1
📄 Gangani, C. M. (2024). Automated Data Integrity Checks for Financial Software Systems. Journal of Sustainable Solutions, 1(4), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.36676/j.sust.sol.v1.i4.52
📄 Gangani, C. M. (2019). Applications of Java in Real-Time Data Processing for Healthcare. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(5), 359–370.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.