eISSN: 3087-4262 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Intelligent Data and Machine Learning

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

A Python Framework for Causal Discovery in Non-Gaussian Linear Models: The PyCD-LiNGAM Library

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/
PDF
Prof. Elena M. Petrova 1 ,
4 Faculty of Data Science, Veltins Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Background: Causal discovery from observational data is a critical challenge across scientific disciplines. While traditional methods often rely on correlation, they fail to distinguish between causation and spurious association. The Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model (LiNGAM) addresses this by leveraging the non-Gaussianity of data to uniquely identify the causal structure, but a comprehensive, user-friendly, and open-source implementation in Python has been lacking.

Met

hods: We introduce PyCD-LiNGAM, a dedicated Python framework designed for state-of-the-art causal discovery using LiNGAM-based methods. The library's core is built around specialized algorithms such as ICA-LiNGAM and DirectLiNGAM for robustly inferring causal ordering and estimating connection strengths. The framework is architected with a modular design, enabling researchers to easily configure parameters, integrate new methods, and handle complex scenarios through advanced features for latent confounder detection and time-series analysis. For validation, PyCD-LiNGAM includes tools for statistical reliability assessment via bootstrap methods and uses metrics like the Structural Hamming Distance (SHD) to evaluate performance.

Results: Benchmark experiments conducted on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that PyCD-LiNGAM achieves high accuracy and strong scalability. The framework consistently outperforms established baseline methods by effectively recovering the true causal graph, especially in settings with non-Gaussian error distributions. The built-in visualization tools allow for clear and interpretable representation of the discovered directed acyclic graphs.

Conclusion: PyCD-LiNGAM serves as a foundational and accessible tool for researchers to apply advanced causal discovery techniques. Its specialized design and robust implementation lower the barrier for integrating causal inference into data analysis pipelines across fields such as econometrics, neuroscience, and genomics. While currently focused on linear, acyclic models, future development will aim to extend the framework to include non-linear methods and improve scalability, further solidifying its role in evidence-based scientific research.

Keywords

Causal discovery, LiNGAM, Python, machine learning

References

📄 Bhattacharya, R., Nabi, R., & Shpitser, I. (2020). Semiparametric inference for causal effects in graphical models with hidden variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.12659.
📄 Campomanes, P., Neri, M., Horta, B. A. C., Roehrig, U. F., Vanni, S., Tavernelli, I., & Rothlisberger, U. (2014). Origin of the spectral shifts among the early intermediates of the rhodopsin photocycle. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136(10), 3842-3851. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja410334g
📄 Chickering, D. M. (2002). Optimal structure identification with greedy search. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 507-554.
📄 Drton, M., & Maathuis, M. H. (2017). Structure learning in graphical modeling. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 365-393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-053803
📄 Entner, D., & Hoyer, P. O. (2011). Discovering unconfounded causal relationships using linear non-Gaussian models. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 181-195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_17
📄 Gerhardus, A., & Runge, J. (2020). High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounders. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 12615-12625.
📄 Glymour, C., Zhang, K., & Spirtes, P. (2019). Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00524
📄 Hoyer, P. O., Shimizu, S., Kerminen, A., & Palviainen, M. (2008). Estimation of causal effects using linear non-Gaussian causal models with hidden variables. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 49(2), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2008.02.002
📄 Hoyer, P. O., Janzing, D., Mooij, J., Peters, J., & Schölkopf, B. (2009). Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 21, 689-696.
📄 Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001). Independent Component Analysis. Wiley.
📄 Hyvärinen, A., Zhang, K., Shimizu, S., & Hoyer, P. O. (2010). Estimation of a structural vector autoregressive model using non-Gaussianity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 1709-1731.
📄 Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
📄 Jung, Y., Tian, J., & Bareinboim, E. (2020). Estimating causal effects using weighting-based estimators. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34, 10186-10193. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i06.6608
📄 Kadowaki, K., Shimizu, S., & Washio, T. (2013). Estimation of causal structures in longitudinal data using non-Gaussianity. 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2013.6661910
📄 Kalainathan, D., Goudet, O., & Dutta, R. (2020). Causal discovery toolbox: Uncovering causal relationships in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(37), 1-5. http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/19-187.html

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.