eISSN: 3087-405X editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Research Journal of Medical Sciences and Health Care

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Regenerative Economic Approaches for Resource Optimization in Agriculture and Food Networks

DOI
PDF
Dr. S. Shrestha 1 ,
4 Institute of Engineering, Nepal

Abstract

The increasing pressure on global food systems due to population growth, climate change, and resource depletion necessitates a paradigm shift from extractive agricultural practices to regenerative economic approaches. This research paper explores how regenerative economic frameworks can optimize resource utilization in agriculture and food networks while promoting sustainability, resilience, and socio-economic equity. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of circular economy principles, inclusive economic growth, and technological integration, the study examines the mechanisms through which regenerative models enhance efficiency in water, energy, soil, and waste management systems.

The paper integrates interdisciplinary perspectives, combining insights from sustainability economics, sensor-based agricultural monitoring, and socio-economic inequality research. It critically evaluates how regenerative agriculture, circular food systems, and digital technologies such as ubiquitous sensor networks contribute to reducing inefficiencies and environmental degradation. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of circular economy adoption in agriculture as highlighted by Agarwal et al. (2025), which is cited throughout the paper to anchor theoretical and applied analysis.

The study identifies key drivers of regenerative transformation, including technological innovation, policy frameworks, financial inclusion, and stakeholder collaboration. It further investigates constraints such as infrastructural limitations, socio-economic disparities, and governance challenges that hinder large-scale adoption. Through analytical synthesis, the paper proposes a multi-layered framework for resource optimization that integrates ecological regeneration, economic viability, and social inclusiveness.

Findings suggest that regenerative economic approaches significantly improve resource productivity, reduce waste, and enhance system resilience. However, the success of these models depends on systemic alignment across policy, technology, and socio-economic structures. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for integrated governance strategies and scalable technological solutions to support the transition toward regenerative food systems.

Keywords

Regenerative Economy, Circular Agriculture, Resource Optimization, Food Networks

References

Agarwal, R., Sri Varshni, J., Harini, P. (2025). Adoption of Circular Economy in Food and Agriculture. In: Kandpal, V., Gunasekaran, A., Jaswal, A., Mukherjee, D. (eds) Rethinking Resources. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9055-8_16
Bagula, M. Zennaro, G. Inggs, S. Scott, and D. Gascon, “Ubiquitous sensor networking for development (USN4D): An application to pollution monitoring,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 391–414, Jan. 2012.
A. Menegaki, “The Basic, the Solid, the Site-Specific and the Full or Total Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for Turkey,” Economies, vol. 6, p. 24, 2018.
A. Liddle, “Urbanization and Inequality/Poverty,” Urban Science, vol. 1, p. 35, 2017.
E. Ferragina, M. Tomlinson, and R. Walker, “Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain,” Social Policy and Society, vol. 16, pp. 535–559, 2016.
E. N. O. Ogbeide and D. O. Agu, “Poverty and Income Inequality in Nigeria: Any Causality?,” Asian Economic and Financial Review, vol. 5, pp. 439–452, 2015.
G. Zhou, K. Gong, S. Luo, and G. Xu, “Inclusive Finance, Human Capital and Regional Economic Growth in China,” Sustainability, vol. 10, p. 1194, 2018.
J. H. Price, J. Khubchandani, and F. J. Webb, “Poverty and Health Disparities: What Can Public Health Professionals Do?,” Health Promot Pract, vol. 19, pp. 170–174, Mar 2018.
J.-E. Lee, S.-H. Cha, D. Kim, and K.-H. Cho, “Autonomous management of large-scale ubiquitous sensor networks,” in Proc. Emerg. Directions Embedded Ubiquitous Comput. (EUC Workshops). Cham, Switzerland : Springer, Jan. 2006, pp. 609–618.
L. Magnani, Heuristic Reasoning vol. 16 : Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015.
M. B. Ridha, “The Role of Heuristic Methods as a Decision-Making Tool in Aggregate Production Planning,” International Journal of Business Administration, vol. 6, 2015.
M. S. Kro, “The relationship between water, poverty and health expenditure: An analysis,” International Journal of Research Granthaalayah, vol. 5, pp. 214–218, 2017.
R. Islam, A. B. A. Ghani, r. Z. Abidin, and J. M. Rayaiappan, “Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth,” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 15, pp. 55–62, 2017.
S. A. Martinez, L. A. Beebe, D. M. Thompson, T. L. Wagener, D. R. Terrell, and J. E. Campbell, “A structural equation modeling approach to understanding pathways that connect socioeconomic status and smoking,” PLoS One, vol. 13, p. e0192451, 2018.
T. Foster, T. Mieno, and N. Brozović, “Satellite-based monitoring of irrigation water use: Assessing measurement errors and their implications for agricultural water management policy,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 56, no. 11, p. 2020, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1029/2020wr028378.
T. Kelly, and M. Adolph, “Ubiquitous sensor networks (USN),” ITU-T Watch Briefing Rep. Ser., Tech. Rep. 4, 2008.
United Nations. ( 2023 ). Population. Accessed: Aug. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/population
W. Mustapa, A. A. Mamun, and M. Ibrahim, “Economic Impact of Development Initiatives on Low-Income Households in Kelantan, Malaysia,” Social Sciences, vol. 7, p. 118, 2018.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>