eISSN: 3023-3267 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

Critique Open Research & Review

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Prostate Cancer Knowledge Among Male Postgraduate Students In The Uk: Domain-Specific Knowledge Gaps And Socio-Demographic Differentials

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/corr-v04i05-05
PDF
Stanley Obakpororo Ogidi 1 , Freedom Nwakaego Igheghe 1 , Kennedy Oberhiri Obohwemu 1 ORCID iD , Kingsley Chike Madubuike 1 ORCID iD , Gordon Mabengban Yakpir 1 , Olusunmola Osinubi 1 , Methodius Ehizokhale Okouzi 1 , Jude C. Ihugba 1 ,
4 MScPH, Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 MScPH, Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 PhD, Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 FMCPath, Histopathology Department, Faculty of Basic Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria; Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 PhD, Faculty of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, GBS Partnership, Birmingham Campus, United Kingdom;Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics,PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 PhD, Department of Health and Social Care, Scholars School System, Leeds Trinity University Partnership, Leicester Campus, United Kingdom; Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 MSc, Program for Appropriate Health in Technology (PATH), Uyo, Akwa Ibom, Nigeria; Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom
4 PhD, Faculty of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, GBS Partnership, Birmingham Campus, United Kingdom;Department of Interdisciplinary Research and Statistics,PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer knowledge is important for informed risk perception, recognition of possible symptoms and engagement with diagnostic services. However, relatively high educational attainment may not translate into comprehensive disease-specific knowledge, and aggregate knowledge scores can conceal important gaps across individual knowledge domains.

Aim: To examine the pattern and socio-demographic distribution of prostate cancer knowledge among male postgraduate students at a UK university, with particular attention to domain-specific knowledge gaps.

Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among male postgraduate students at the University of Sunderland, North East England. The minimum calculated sample size was 349, with recruitment increased to 400 to accommodate anticipated non-response. A total of 367 completed questionnaires were analysed. The questionnaire assessed general prostate cancer knowledge, symptoms and treatment, risk factors, and socio-demographic characteristics. Knowledge was examined at item and cumulative levels. Frequencies and percentages were calculated, and Pearson's Chi-square tests assessed associations between cumulative knowledge and age, marital status, academic faculty and ethnicity. Statistical significance was set at p< .05.

Results: Of the 367 participants, 58.0% were classified as having high cumulative prostate cancer knowledge and 42.0% as having low knowledge. Knowledge varied substantially across individual items. Difficulty urinating (75.2%), family history (73.6%), surgical treatment (73.1%), older age (72.5%) and bloody urine (72.2%) were among the more frequently recognised items. In contrast, only 32.4% recognised ethnicity as a prostate cancer risk factor. Academic faculty was significantly associated with cumulative knowledge, χ²(4) = 44.396, p< .001, with the proportion classified as having high knowledge ranging from 29.3% among Technology students to 76.2% among Health Sciences and Wellbeing students. Age approached but did not reach statistical significance, χ²(4) = 8.812, p = .051. No significant associations were observed for marital status (p = .104) or ethnicity (p = .323).

Conclusion: Prostate cancer knowledge among male postgraduate students was uneven despite a majority being classified as having high cumulative knowledge. The aggregate classification concealed important domain-specific gaps, particularly in recognition of ethnicity as a risk factor, while knowledge differed substantially across academic faculties. University-based prostate cancer education should therefore address specific knowledge deficits rather than assume that postgraduate educational attainment is accompanied by comprehensive disease-specific knowledge.

Keywords

Prostate cancer, knowledge, awareness, risk factors

References

Alexis, O., Mansbridge, S., &Garbrah, W. (2024). Raising awareness of prostate cancer amongst black communities in the south of England. Ethnicity & Health, 29(3), 328-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2323465
Benafif, S., Kote-Jarai, Z., Eeles, R. A., & PRACTICAL Consortium. (2018). A review of prostate cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 27(8), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1046
Bergengren, O., Pekala, K. R., Matsoukas, K., Fainberg, J., Mungovan, S. F., Bratt, O., Bray, F., Brawley, O., Luckenbaugh, A. N., Mucci, L., Morgan, T. M., & Carlsson, S. V. (2023). 2022 update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors: A systematic review. European Urology, 84(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021
Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
Charan, J., & Biswas, T. (2013). How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.116232
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Coughlin, S. S., Vernon, M., Klaassen, Z., Tingen, M. S., & Cortes, J. E. (2021). Knowledge of prostate cancer among African American men: A systematic review. The Prostate, 81(3), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24097
Dada, L. F., Shaba, O. P., Omolumen, L. E., Chinaedozi, K., Imafidon, N. O., Eigbedion, A. O., &Obohwemu, K. O. (2026). Evaluation of Prostate-Specific Antigen and some Micronutri-ents in individuals with Type-II Diabetes Mellitus attending the University of Medical Science Teaching Hospital in Akure, Nigeria. Healthcare Issues, 5(1), 14-22.
Dess, R. T., Hartman, H. E., Mahal, B. A., Soni, P. D., Jackson, W. C., Cooperberg, M. R., Amling, C. L., Aronson, W. J., Kane, C. J., Terris, M. K., Zumsteg, Z. S., Butler, S., Osborne, J. R., Salami, S. S., D'Amico, A. V., & Spratt, D. E. (2019). Association of Black race with prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality. JAMA Oncology, 5(7), 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0826
Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Fry, S. L., Hopkinson, J., & Kelly, D. (2022). "We're talking about black men here, there's a difference"; cultural differences in socialised knowledge of prostate cancer risk: A qualitative research study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 56, 102080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102080
James, N. D., Tannock, I., N'Dow, J., Feng, F., Gillessen, S., Ali, S. A., Trujillo, B., Al-Lazikani, B., Attard, G., Bray, F., Compérat, E., Efstathiou, E., Fanti, S., Haran, Á. M., Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., Kamara, T. B., Koyama, T., Larkin, J., Mason, M., ... Zelefsky, M. J. (2024). The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: Planning for the surge in cases. The Lancet, 403(10437), 1683–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00651-2
Leitão, C., Neto, V., Silva, L., Estrela, M., Fardilha, M., Roque, F., & Herdeiro, M. T. (2025). Perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of general population about prostate cancer-associated risk factors: A systematic review of qualitative studies focusing on lifestyle. Current Oncology Reports, 27(4), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01653-7
Loeb, S., Sanchez Nolasco, T., Byrne, N., Allen, L., Langford, A. T., Ravenell, J., Gomez, S. L., Washington, S. L., Borno, H. T., Griffith, D. M., &Criner, N. (2024). Representation matters: Trust in digital health information among Black patients with prostate cancer. The Journal of Urology, 211(3), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003822
Martin, R. M., Donovan, J. L., Turner, E. L., Metcalfe, C., Young, G. J., Walsh, E. I., Lane, J. A., Noble, S., Oliver, S. E., Evans, S., Sterne, J. A. C., Holding, P., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Brindle, P., Williams, N. J., Hill, E. M., Ng, S. Y., Toole, J., Tazewell, M. K., ... CAP Trial Group. (2018). Effect of a low-intensity PSA-based screening intervention on prostate cancer mortality: The CAP randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 319(9), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0154
Mumuni, S., O'Donnell, C., & Doody, O. (2023). The risk factors and screening uptake for prostate cancer: A scoping review. Healthcare, 11(20), 2780. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202780
Rao, A. G., Dkhar, W., Sharath, S., Kadavigere, R., & Pradhan, A. (2023). Knowledge, awareness and practice towards screening for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 33(3), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i3.19
Shaw, B., Walter, F. M., Hamilton, W., & Martins, T. (2023). Symptom appraisal and help seeking in males with symptoms of possible prostate cancer: A qualitative study with an ethnically diverse sample in London. British Journal of General Practice, 73(732), e502-e510. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0554
Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., & Brand, H. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., &Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Medicine, 4(10), e296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-20 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.