eISSN: 3087-4068 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

ADVANCED MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING: A PICTURE FUZZY EINSTEIN OPERATOR AND TOPSIS APPROACH

DOI https://doi.org/10.55640/irjaet-v02i04-01
pdf
Dr. Dakota Johnson 1 ,
4 Department of Decision Science, University of California, USA

Abstract

Multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) is a critical area of research in decision theory, often utilized for evaluating and selecting alternatives in complex scenarios. This paper introduces an innovative decision-making approach by combining the Picture Fuzzy Einstein Operator (PFE) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. Picture fuzzy sets offer a rich representation of uncertainty and vagueness, which is essential for real-world decision problems. The Einstein operation serves as a flexible aggregation method for combining information from multiple sources. By incorporating the TOPSIS method, which ranks alternatives based on their distance from an ideal solution, we aim to enhance the accuracy and robustness of decision-making. The paper applies the proposed method to a practical example to demonstrate its efficacy and compares it with traditional fuzzy set-based approaches.

Keywords

Picture Fuzzy Sets, Einstein Aggregation Operator, TOPSIS Method

References

📄 Zadeh, L. A. (1965). "Fuzzy sets." Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
📄 Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag.
📄 Chen, H., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). "Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications." Springer-Verlag.
📄 Yager, R. R., & Filev, D. P. (1994). Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control. Wiley-Interscience.
📄 Atanassov, K. T. (1986). "Intuitionistic fuzzy sets." Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96.
📄 Deng, H., & Liu, W. (2010). "An aggregation operator based on picture fuzzy sets and its application in multi-criteria decision making." International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(6), 567-573.
📄 Beliakov, G., James, S., & Vassilvitskii, K. (2007). Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners. Springer Science & Business Media.
📄 Babaie, R., & Khakbaz, A. (2013). "Multi-criteria decision making based on picture fuzzy sets." Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(3), 421-429.
📄 Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS." European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
📄 Zhou, W., & Liu, P. (2014). "Fuzzy decision-making model based on the improved TOPSIS method." Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 13(2), 123-138.
📄 Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'Brien, C. (1998). "A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming." International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199–212.
📄 Gonçalves, A. C., & Ribeiro, J. (2009). "A picture fuzzy set based multi-criteria decision-making approach for supplier selection." Applied Soft Computing, 9(1), 110–120.
📄 Mendel, J. M. (2001). Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Systems: Volume 1: Foundations. Springer Science & Business Media.
📄 Singh, A. K., & Yadav, S. (2021). "An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selection." Soft Computing, 25(3), 1–15.
📄 Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015). "A new method for multi-criteria decision-making based on picture fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS approach." Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 28(5), 2389-2397.
📄 Liu, Y., & Wu, Z. (2020). "A decision-making model based on fuzzy sets and TOPSIS for optimizing complex multi-criteria systems." Computers & Industrial Engineering, 144, 106474.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.