Open Access

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Nonlinear Analysis

https://doi.org/10.55640/irjaet-v03i04-01

PDF

Muhammad arslan Shabbir ¹ ,

⁴ Muslim youth university, Civil engineering department, MS in structure engineering, Pakistan

Abstract

Earthquakes pose significant threats to reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, necessitating accurate performance evaluation methods beyond traditional linear elastic approaches. This study comprehensively evaluates the seismic behavior of RC buildings employing nonlinear analysis techniques, including pushover analysis and nonlinear time-history analysis. A ten-story RC frame structure was modeled and subjected to varying seismic intensities to assess performance levels—Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS), and Collapse Prevention (CP)—as defined by FEMA-356 guidelines. Material nonlinearity encompassing concrete cracking, crushing, and steel reinforcement yielding was incorporated to capture realistic structural response mechanisms.

The results demonstrate that nonlinear static pushover analysis effectively estimates structural capacity curves, plastic hinge formation sequences, and identifies weak story mechanisms. However, nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis provides superior accuracy in capturing time-dependent behavior, including displacement demands, inter-story drift distributions, and cumulative damage effects under actual ground motion records. Key performance indicators evaluated include base shear capacity, roof displacement, inter-story drift ratios, and plastic hinge rotation demands. Buildings designed according to modern seismic codes (ASCE 7-16, Eurocode 8) exhibited significantly enhanced performance with stable hysteresis and ductile behavior compared to older structures lacking seismic detailing. Furthermore, vertical and plan irregularities were found to adversely affect performance, inducing torsional responses and localized damage concentrations.

This research underscores the critical importance of nonlinear analysis in performance-based seismic design frameworks, providing actionable insights for enhancing RC structural resilience. The findings contribute to safer design methodologies and effective retrofitting strategies for existing vulnerable buildings.

Keywords

Reinforced Concrete, Seismic Performance, Nonlinear Analysis, Pushover Analysis

References

Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons.

Chopra, A. K. (2012). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Clough, R. W., & Penzien, J. (2003). Dynamics of Structures (3rd ed.). Computers & Structures Inc.

Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. John Wiley & Sons.

SEAOC. (1999). Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book). Structural Engineers Association of California.

CEN. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance (EN 1998-1). European Committee for Standardization.

ASCE. (2016). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-16). American Society of Civil Engineers.

Northridge Earthquake Reconnaissance Team. (1994). Preliminary Report on the Seismic Performance of Buildings in the Northridge Earthquake. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

Kobe Earthquake Reconnaissance Team. (1995). *The Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake of January 17, 1995: Performance of Structures*. EERI Publication No. 95-02.

Ghobarah, A. (2004). Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(spec01), 1-4.

Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561-582.

FEMA-356. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

ATC-40. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Applied Technology Council.

Krawinkler, H., & Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. (1998). Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering Structures, 20(4-6), 452-464.

Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514.

Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., & Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. IUSS Press.

Fajfar, P. (2000). A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 16(3), 573-592.

Tso, W. K., & Dempsey, K. M. (1980). Seismic torsional provisions for building codes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(1), 36-45.

Chopra, A. K. (2001). Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering. CRC Press.

Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804-1826.

Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons. [Same as [1]]

Computers & Structures Inc. (2015). *CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS, and PERFORM-3D*. CSI.

Journal of Earthquake Engineering. (2018). Special Issue: Nonlinear Analysis in Seismic Design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(5), 721-950.

Teng, J. G., Chen, J. F., Smith, S. T., & Lam, L. (2002). FRP-Strengthened RC Structures. John Wiley & Sons.

Kelly, J. M. (1997). Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber (2nd ed.). Springer.

SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee. (1995). Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings. Structural Engineers Association of California.

PEER. (2010). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. 2010/05.

Ghobarah, A. (2004). Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(spec01), 1-4. [Same as [10]]

Moehle, J. P. (2000). Seismic Design Considerations for Irregular Structures. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

Priestley, M. J. N. (1993). Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering—revisited. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>

International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Nonlinear Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles