Open Access

aim journal -Advancing Structural-8-13

4 Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced polymer systems have progressively emerged as a transformative class of materials within the domain of concrete construction, rehabilitation, and structural retrofitting, reshaping conventional understandings of durability, resilience, and lifecycle performance. Over recent decades, the construction industry has faced escalating challenges associated with aging infrastructure, aggressive environmental exposure, seismic vulnerability, and limitations inherent in traditional steel-reinforced concrete systems. These challenges have catalyzed scholarly and professional interest in alternative materials capable of delivering enhanced mechanical performance, corrosion resistance, and adaptability without imposing excessive structural or economic burdens. Fibre-reinforced polymers, encompassing carbon, glass, aramid, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and hybrid fibre systems embedded in polymeric matrices, have become central to this discourse due to their exceptional strength-to-weight ratios, tailorability, and compatibility with diverse retrofitting strategies (Bandela, 2025).

This research article presents an extensive, theory-driven and literature-grounded investigation into the role of fibre-reinforced polymer systems in advancing construction practices, with particular emphasis on structural retrofitting of reinforced concrete buildings. The study situates fibre-reinforced polymers within a broader historical and theoretical framework of construction material evolution, tracing their emergence from aerospace and marine engineering into mainstream civil infrastructure. It critically examines the mechanical, durability, and seismic performance implications of fibre-reinforced polymer integration, drawing on a wide spectrum of experimental, analytical, and review-based scholarship to articulate nuanced interpretations of material behavior under service and extreme loading conditions (Gorai & Maiti, 2019; Nandhini et al., 2020).

Methodologically, the article adopts a qualitative, interpretive research design grounded in systematic literature synthesis and comparative theoretical analysis. Rather than pursuing empirical experimentation, the study interrogates existing scholarly findings to identify convergences, divergences, and unresolved debates regarding fibre-reinforced polymer applications in concrete systems. Particular attention is paid to retrofitting strategies for corrosion-damaged columns, seismic strengthening of precast and cast-in-situ structures, and the comparative performance of different fibre typologies and laminate configurations (Eskandari-Naddaf et al., 2016; Subha Javgal et al., 2019). The methodological approach emphasizes epistemological rigor, contextual sensitivity, and critical engagement with limitations and assumptions embedded in prior research.

The results of this analysis reveal that fibre-reinforced polymer systems consistently demonstrate superior performance in enhancing load-carrying capacity, ductility, and durability of reinforced concrete elements when compared to conventional strengthening techniques. However, these benefits are neither uniform nor universally applicable; they are mediated by factors such as fibre type, matrix composition, bonding mechanisms, environmental exposure, and structural typology. The findings underscore the necessity of context-specific design frameworks and caution against overly generalized claims regarding fibre-reinforced polymer efficacy (Bandela, 2025; Sarker et al., 2011).

The discussion advances a comprehensive theoretical interpretation of these results, situating them within contemporary debates on sustainable construction, resilience-based design, and performance-based seismic retrofitting. It critically evaluates regulatory guidelines, such as capacity spectrum methods and seismic assessment frameworks, in light of fibre-reinforced polymer integration, highlighting gaps between codified practice and emerging material capabilities (Fajfar, 1999; ATC, 1996). The article concludes by articulating future research directions aimed at harmonizing material innovation with design standards, life-cycle assessment, and ethical considerations in infrastructure development.

By offering an expansive, analytically rich examination of fibre-reinforced polymer systems in concrete construction, this study contributes to the theoretical consolidation and practical advancement of resilient, durable, and adaptable built environments.

Keywords

References

πŸ“„ Eskandari-Naddaf, H., et al. (2016). Optimal methods for retrofitting corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete columns.
πŸ“„ Bandela, K. (2025). Advancing construction with fibre-reinforced polymer in construction projects. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-17
πŸ“„ Clementi, F., Scalbi, A., & Lenci, S. (2016). Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings with dowel pin connections. Journal of Building Engineering, 7, 224–238.
πŸ“„ Krishnamoorthy, M., et al. (2017). Durability studies on polyethylene terephthalate fibre reinforced concrete. Journal of Civil Engineering Science and Technology.
πŸ“„ Madhavi, T. Ch., et al. (2014). Polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete: A review.
πŸ“„ Subha Javgal, et al. (2019). A comparative study of the behavior of CFRP and GFRP laminates in a plate specimen using modified virtual crack closure technique. Procedia Structural Integrity, 14, 907–914.
πŸ“„ ATC. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). Applied Technology Council.
πŸ“„ Gorai, S., & Maiti, P. R. (2019). Advanced retrofitting techniques for reinforced concrete structures.
πŸ“„ Nandhini, R., et al. (2020). Retrofitting of concrete structure using fibre reinforced polymer: A review. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(02).
πŸ“„ Sarker, P., et al. (2011). Fiber reinforced polymers for structural retrofitting. Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB).
πŸ“„ Fajfar, P. (1999). Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(9), 979–993.
πŸ“„ Valente, M., & Milani, G. (2016). Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Construction and Building Materials, 108.
πŸ“„ Amsa, et al. (2018). Experimental study on polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete.
πŸ“„ Dinberu Mola Yemam, et al. (2017). Mechanical properties of epoxy resin mortar with sand washing waste as filler. Materials.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.