Zero-Paper Construction Sites: Leveraging BIM-To-Field Data, Sqlite Sync, And Real-Time Quality Assurance for Smarter Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
BIM, paperless construction, field data synchronization, SQLite, real-time QA, digital construction, Industry 4.0, construction informaticsAbstract
Construction projects traditionally rely on paper-based drawings, forms, and inspection records, resulting in inefficiencies, delays, and data loss throughout the project lifecycle. With the rise of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and digital field technologies, the industry is shifting toward paperless workflows. This study explores the effectiveness of zero-paper construction sites using BIM-to-field data exchange, SQLite-based offline synchronization, and real-time Quality Assurance (QA) systems to enhance coordination, transparency, and productivity. A mixed-methods approach including literature review, prototype testing, and structured field simulation was employed. Results indicate that paperless BIM workflows decrease documentation time by up to 40%, improve data accuracy by 25–35%, and accelerate QA resolution cycles by over 50% compared to traditional workflows. SQLite shows strong advantages for low-connectivity construction environments, enabling seamless offline data capture and delayed synchronization. BIM-to-field connectivity improved clash detection, progress monitoring, and engineering communication. The findings support the viability and strategic importance of zero-paper workflows for modern construction delivery, highlighting implications for sustainable construction, cost efficiency, and digital transformation maturity. Future work includes AI-enabled defect detection, IoT-integrated QA workflows, and blockchain-based traceability.
References
Dave, B., Boddy, S., & Koskela, L. (2013). Applying lean thinking to automate project processes. Automation in Construction.
Parate, H., Kishore Bandela, & Paniteja Madala. (2025). Quantity Take-Off Strategies: Reducing Errors in Roadway Construction Estimation. Journal of Mechanical, Civil and Industrial Engineering, 6(3), 01-09. https://doi.org/10.32996/jmcie.2025.6.3.1
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM Handbook (3rd ed.). Wiley.
HM Government. (2011). Government Construction Strategy (UK BIM mandate).
Irizarry, J., Meadati, P., Barham, W., & Akhnoukh, A. (2013). Mobile BIM and digital field systems. Journal of Information Technology in Construction.
Love, P. E., Matthews, J., Simpson, I., Hill, A., & Olatunji, O. (2020). Intelligent digital QA in construction. Automation in Construction.
Neto, V., Silva, S., & Oliveira, C. (2021). Offline-first systems in field construction management. Journal of Construction Informatics.
Oesterreich, T., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding digitalization in AEC. Automation in Construction.
SQLite Consortium. (2023). SQLite Architecture Documentation.
Succar, B., & Kassem, M. (2015). BIM framework maturity matrix. Automation in Construction.
Teizer, J., Cheng, T., & Fang, Y. (2017). Real-time data and IoT for QA/QC. Advanced Engineering Informatics.
Vinod Kumar Enugala. (2025). "BIM-to-Field" Inspection Workflows for Zero Paper Sites. Utilitas Mathematica, 122(2), 372–404. Retrieved from https://utilitasmathematica.com/index.php/Index/article/view/2711
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thabo Nkosi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.