4
MSc, Department of Project Management, Faculty of Business and Law, University of Northampton, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Studies & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
PhD,Health Business School, Health Science University, London, United Kingdom; and PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
PhD,Department of Interdisciplinary Studies & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
PhD,Department of Business Management, Scholars School System, Leeds Trinity University Partnership, Bradford Campus, United Kingdom
4
PhD,Faculty of Business Management and Enterprise, Leeds Trinity University, GBS Partnership, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
MPH,Digital Health and Rights Project (Center for Interdisciplinary Methodologies, CIM), University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
MHPM,World Health Organisation, Abuja, Nigeria; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
PhD,Department of Management Studies, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain; and PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
MSc,Department of Psychology, St. Mary’s University, London, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
4
PhD,School of Health and Sports Science, Regent College, London, United Kingdom; and Department of Interdisciplinary Research & Statistics, PENKUP Research Institute, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Remote working has shifted from a marginal practice to a central feature of contemporary employment, particularly within the information technology sector, where digital infrastructure and project-based work make distributed arrangements common. Although many studies report positive links between remote work and employee satisfaction, the existing evidence often remains fragmented or focused on narrow indicators. A broader perspective is needed to understand how employees actually experience remote work and why satisfaction varies across individuals and organisations.
This paper offers a theoretically grounded reappraisal of how remote working shapes satisfaction through wellbeing, work-life balance and perceptions of organisational support. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory and Self Determination Theory, the paper brings together recent empirical findings and organisational scholarship to show that satisfaction in remote settings does not arise from flexibility alone. It develops through the quality of autonomy, employees experience, the strength of their relationships with the organisation and the way remote work practices are structured and supported. These processes influence how employees interpret their work environment, manage boundaries and sustain motivation.
The paper contributes to current debates by clarifying the mechanisms that strengthen or weaken satisfaction in the IT sector. It also presents a conceptual framework that moves beyond simple comparisons between remote and office‑based work, offering a more grounded understanding of the conditions that support positive remote work experiences. Implications are outlined for organisations seeking to promote wellbeing, engagement and sustainable performance in digitally mediated environments.
Keywords
Remote working, employee satisfaction, wellbeing, information technology sector, social exchange theory, self-determination theory
References
📄Adisa, T. A., Antonacopoulou, E., Beauregard, T. A., Dickmann, M., & Adekoya, O. D. (2022). Exploring the impact of COVID‐19 on employees’ boundary management and work–life balance. British journal of management, 33(4), 1694-1709.
📄Ahmadi, N., & Shadpour, N. (2025). Unlocking the Potential of New Work Models: What HR Leaders Need to Know About Employee Satisfaction, Retention, and Performance. Retention, and Performance (May 15, 2025).
📄Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
📄Belaid, S., Ben Guedria, N., & Ballouk, H. (2025). Remote work and job satisfaction: A decade of insights through a bibliometric lens. Administrative Sciences, 15(11), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15110439
📄Bilderback, S., & Kilpatrick, M. D. (2024). Global perspectives on redefining workplace presence: The impact of remote work on organizational culture. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 4(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEET-08-2024-0023
📄Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
📄Brinson, N., Amini, B., Lemon, L., & Bawole, C. (2024). Electronic performance monitoring: The role of reactance, trust, and privacy concerns in predicting job satisfaction in the post pandemic workplace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 18(5), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2024-5-10
📄Byrd, M. Y. (2022). Creating a culture of inclusion and belongingness in remote work environments that sustains meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 145-162.
📄Capone, V., Schettino, G., Marino, L., Camerlingo, C., Smith, A., & Depolo, M. (2024). The new normal of remote work: Exploring individual and organizational factors affecting work related outcomes and wellbeing in academia. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340094
📄Cappetta, R., Lo Cascio, S., Magni, M., & Marsico, A. (2025). Beyond the office: An examination of remote work, social and job features on individual satisfaction and engagement. Personnel Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2024-0357
📄Couto, R., Lopes, S., Carvalho, V.S., Chambel, M.J. (2025). Telework and Well-Being: Investigating the Role of Motivation in Shaping Remote Work Experiences. In: Machado, C. (eds) Human Resource Management in a Disrupted World. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89948-5_12
📄Dzandu, M. D., Hatsu, S., & De Cesare, S. (2023). Remote working and task innovativeness: An integrated resource based view and antecedent behaviour consequence perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 27, 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10452-z
📄Joanna, W., & Jerzy, K. (2020). Conceptualizing job satisfaction and its determinants: A systematic literature review. Экономическая социология, 21(5), 138-167.
📄Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., ... & Vugt, M. V. (2021). COVID 19 and the workplace. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
📄McAnally, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2024). Self Determination Theory and workplace outcomes: A conceptual review and future research directions. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060428
📄Okuboye, A. (2021). Cross-cultural variability in workforce optimization: A BPM perspective on remote and hybrid teams. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Futuristic Development, 2(1), 15-24.
📄Olafsen, A. H., Marescaux, B. P., & Kujanpää, M. (2025). Crafting for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: A self‐determination theory model of need crafting at work. Applied Psychology, 74(1), e12570.
📄Peiró, J. M., Bravo Duarte, F., González Anta, B., & Todolí Signes, A. (2024). Supervisory performance in telework: The role of job demands, resources, and satisfaction with telework. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2024.1430812
📄Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual work. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0020
📄Saleem, U., & Khan, N. A. (2024). Remote work and job satisfaction: A case study of IT professionals. Administrative and Management Sciences Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59365/amsj.3(1).2024.108
📄Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C., & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 163-181.
📄Tarigan, A., Gustomo, A., & Bangun, Y. R. (2023). Enhancing fairness in performance appraisals: A conceptual framework through a systematic literature review. Journal of Advances in Humanities Research ISSN, 2948, 4863.
📄van Dick, R., Baethge, A., & Junker, N. M. (2024). Editorial: Implications of remote work on employee well being and health. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2024.1498944
📄Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied psychology, 70(1), 16-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290