Open Access

AI-AUGMENTED FRAMEWORKS FOR DATA QUALITY VALIDATION: INTEGRATING RULE-BASED ENGINES, SEMANTIC DEDUPLICATION, AND GOVERNANCE TOOLS FOR ROBUST LARGE-SCALE DATA PIPELINES

4 University of Edinburgh

Abstract

Background: The exponential growth of data generation, coupled with the proliferation of large language models (LLMs) and complex analytic systems, has elevated the importance of comprehensive, scalable, and explainable data quality validation. Traditional rule-based and statistical validation systems face challenges at web-scale data volumes, semantic duplication, and heterogeneous governance requirements (Apache Griffin, 2024; Deequ, 2024; Great Expectations, 2024). Recent work on semantic deduplication and LLM-assisted validation suggests hybrid frameworks that combine deterministic checks, probabilistic inference, and semantic reasoning can yield higher-quality, more actionable validation outcomes (Abbas et al., 2023; Achiam et al., 2023).

Methods: This article synthesizes design principles, operational architectures, and analytic methods into a unified, publication-ready research narrative. We construct a methodological taxonomy that integrates three principal components: (1) deterministic rule engines and metric-based validators drawn from industry-grade tools (Apache Griffin, Deequ, Great Expectations); (2) semantic deduplication and representation learning to reduce redundancy and improve downstream model training (Abbas et al., 2023); and (3) governance orchestration and qualitative-process integration for auditability and human-in-the-loop oversight (Qualitis, Nvivo, wenjuanxing). Each component is elaborated with procedural steps, expected outputs, failure modes, and interoperability constraints, building from both open-source tooling and contemporary academic research (Malviya & Parate, 2025; Wu et al., 2023).

Results: Through a detailed descriptive analysis, we identify how hybrid validation pipelines can achieve improvements in precision and recall of data error detection, reduce model degradation attributable to duplicated or low-quality samples, and enhance human interpretability. Specifically, semantic deduplication reduces redundant training exposures and dataset bloat, while rule-based validators ensure invariants and schema-level integrity (Abbas et al., 2023; Apache Griffin, 2024). Governance modules provide audit trails and decision rationales necessary for regulated domains such as insurance and healthcare (Malviya & Parate, 2025; Diaby et al., 2013).

Conclusions: An AI-augmented hybrid approach—anchored by robust rule engines, enriched by representation-aware deduplication, and governed through orchestration platforms—offers a promising direction for modern data quality validation. This framework balances computational efficiency, explainability, and adaptability, enabling institutions to manage the twin demands of scale and accountability in contemporary data ecosystems (Great Expectations, 2024; Deequ, 2024).

Keywords

References

📄 Apache Griffin. 2024. https://griffin.apache.org/.
📄 Nvivo qualitative software. 2024. https://lumivero.com/products/nvivo/.
📄 Supplemental Materials. 2024. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25928863.
📄 wenjuanxing software. 2024. https://www.wjx.cn.
📄 Abbas, Amro; Tirumala, Kushal; Simig, Dániel; Ganguli, Surya; Morcos, Ari S. 2023. Semdedup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09540.
📄 Achiam, Josh; Adler, Steven; Agarwal, Sandhini; Ahmad, Lama; Akkaya, Ilge; Aleman, Florencia Leoni; Almeida, Diogo; Altenschmidt, Janko; Altman, Sam; Anadkat, Shyamal; et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774.
📄 Kachris, C. 2024. A Survey on Hardware Accelerators for Large Language Models. arXiv:2401.09890.
📄 Wu, L.; Zheng, Z.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, H.; Gu, H.; Shen, T.; Qin, C.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, H.; Liu, Q.; et al. 2023. A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation. arXiv:2305.19860.
📄 Zhao, W.X.; Zhou, K.; Li, J.; Tang, T.; Wang, X.; Hou, Y.; Min, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, J.; Dong, Z.; et al. 2023. A Survey of Large Language Models. arXiv:2303.18223.
📄 Touvron, H.; Martin, L.; Stone, K.; Albert, P.; Almahairi, A.; Babaei, Y.; Bashlykov, N.; Batra, S.; Bhargava, P.; Bhosale, S.; et al. 2023. Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-tuned Chat Models. arXiv:2307.09288.
📄 Agrawal, M.; Hegselmann, S.; Lang, H.; Kim, Y.; Sontag, D. 2022. Large Language Models Are Few-shot Clinical Information Extractors. arXiv:2205.12689.
📄 Roussinov, D.; Conkie, A.; Patterson, A.; Sainsbury, C. 2022. Predicting Clinical Events Based on Raw Text: From Bag-of-Words to Attention-based Transformers. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 810260.
📄 Malviya, S.; Parate, V. 2025. AI-Augmented Data Quality Validation in P&C Insurance: A Hybrid Framework Using Large Language Models and Rule-Based Agents. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3613
📄 Ollitrault, P.J.; Loipersberger, M.; Parrish, R.M.; Erhard, A.; Maier, C.; Sommer, C.; Ulmanis, J.; Monz, T.; Gogolin, C.; Tautermann, C.S.; et al. 2023. Estimation of Electrostatic Interaction Energies on a Trapped-ion Quantum Computer. arXiv:2312.14739.
📄 Diaby, V.; Campbell, K.; Goeree, R. 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis. Operations Research for Health Care, 2, 20–24.
📄 McIntosh, T.R.; Susnjak, T.; Liu, T.; Watters, P.; Halgamuge, M.N. 2024. Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence. arXiv:2402.09880.
📄 Kuo, T. 2017. A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index. European Journal of Operational Research, 260, 152–160.
📄 Tang, R.; Han, X.; Jiang, X.; Hu, X. 2023. Does Synthetic Data Generation of LLMs Help Clinical Text Mining? arXiv:2303.04360.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.