Open Access

Optimizing Continuous Schema Evolution and Zero-Downtime Microservices in Enterprise Data Architectures

4 Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

Abstract

In the era of distributed computing and large-scale enterprise systems, maintaining uninterrupted service availability while evolving system architectures has emerged as a central challenge. Microservices, particularly those implemented in .NET Core, have demonstrated significant potential for modularity, scalability, and resilience. However, the operational reality of continuous deployment and schema evolution in high-availability systems introduces complex technical and theoretical concerns. This study critically examines strategies for zero-downtime migrations within microservices frameworks, with a focus on AuthHub implementations, integrating insights from database schema evolution, virtualization technologies, and semantic mapping approaches. By synthesizing prior research on online upgrades, VM migration, and schema adaptation, the study constructs a multi-layered framework for understanding the interplay between service continuity, schema consistency, and system reliability.

Methodologically, the research employs a qualitative, literature-driven analysis, integrating case studies, theoretical models, and empirical observations from cloud-based service deployments. The study interrogates both the technical mechanisms—such as schema versioning, data migration pipelines, and live VM migration techniques—and the operational implications for enterprise IT governance and transactional integrity. Results highlight the critical role of automated schema evolution processes, semantic mappings between heterogeneous data stores, and robust migration orchestration in enabling uninterrupted service delivery. Notably, .NET Core microservices facilitate modular, service-specific migration strategies that reduce interdependencies and minimize downtime (NET Core Microservices, 2025).

 

The discussion explores the nuanced trade-offs between system adaptability and operational complexity, emphasizing the importance of integrating semantic schema alignment, cross-domain upgrade strategies, and virtualization technologies in a cohesive migration architecture. Limitations of current approaches, particularly in handling high-volume, heterogeneous transactional data, are addressed, and future research directions are proposed, including the development of predictive schema adaptation tools and enhanced orchestration frameworks. This study contributes a comprehensive, theoretically grounded model for continuous, zero-downtime enterprise service evolution, providing practical guidance for architects, engineers, and researchers engaged in the design and operation of resilient microservices ecosystems.

Keywords

References

📄 Y. An and T. Topaloglou, “Semantic web, ontologies and databases,” in VLDB Workshop, SWDB-ODBIS 2007, Vienna, Austria, September 24, 2007, Revised Selected Papers, V. Christophides, M. Collard, and C. Gutierrez, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008, ch. Maintaining Semantic Mappings Between Database Schemas and Ontologies, pp. 138–152.
📄 Burt, J. (2009, November 30). Sun Brings "Teleportation' to VirtualBox Virtualization Software. Retrieved from eweek: http://www.eweek.com/networking/sun-brings-teleportation-tovirtualbox-virtualization-software
📄 E. Rahm, “Towards large-scale schema and ontology matching,” in Schema Matching and Mapping, Z. Bellahsene, A. Bonifati, and E. Rahm, Eds. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, ch. 1, pp. 3–27.Gundry, “Coping with change: data schema migration in haskell,” http://cufp.org/2015/coping-with-change-data-schema-migration-inhaskell.html, 2015.
📄 NET Core Microservices for Zero-Downtime AuthHub Migrations. (2025). European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 10(5), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2025.10.5.3288
📄 S. Scherzinger, M. Klettke, and U. Storl, “Managing schema evolution in NoSQL data stores,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Database Programming Languages (DBPL 2013), 2013.
📄 Y. Velegrakis, R. J. Miller, and L. Popa, “Mapping adaptation under evolving schemas,” in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases - Volume 29, ser. VLDB ’03. VLDB Endowment, 2003, pp. 584–595.
📄 T. Dumitras, P. Narasimhan, and E. Tilevich, “To upgrade or not to upgrade: impact of online upgrades across multiple administrative domains,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications, Reno/Tahoe, NV, Oct 2010, pp. 865–876.
📄 Citrix. (2015, January 20). System Requirements. Retrieved from Citrix: https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/xencenter/6-5/xs-xc-introwelcome/xs-xc-system-requirements.htmlDeshpande and M. Hicks, “Toward on-line schema evolution for non-stop systems,” Presented at the 11th High Performance Transaction Systems Workshop, September 2005
📄 Documentation, O. (2015, October 9). Pool Requirements. Retrieved from Citrix: https://docs.citrix.com.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.