ANALYSIS OF UZBEKISTAN'S RELATIONS WITH CHINA, RUSSIA, AND SOUTH KOREA: UTILIZING TEXT MINING BASED ON GDELT BIG DATA
Abstract
GDELT (Global Dataset on Events, Language, and Tone), a comprehensive event dataset developed in 2013, provides quantifiable data on cooperative and conflictual relations between countries, as well as events related to specific phenomena. Its utility has been widely recognized, and it is actively used in international relations and foreign policy research. This study also utilizes GDELT data to introduce a method for analyzing the relationships between Uzbekistan and China, Russia, and South Korea through keyword correlation indicators derived from text mining, and to present the actual analysis results. By conducting a keyword correlation analysis based on event data between Uzbekistan and the three analyzed countries—China, Russia, and South Korea—it was possible to identify diplomatic action patterns through the correlation of core keywords such as "engage," "express intent," and "make" with keywords indicating specific actions. Uzbekistan’s foreign policy under the Mirziyoyev government has shown a diplomatic action pattern of seeking or participating in negotiations, expressing intentions for negotiation or cooperation, and pursuing meetings for negotiation and cooperation with the analyzed countries, while inviting or visiting counterpart countries as part of these processes. This demonstrates that Uzbekistan has actively worked towards establishing cooperative relations, which were set as the goal or direction of its foreign relations, named the “Good Neighbor Policy” by President Mirziyoyev. Such keyword correlation indicator analysis facilitates the explanation of cooperative relationships.
Keywords
Relations, Big Data, GDELT, CAMEO
References
정승철(Jeong Seungcheol). [빅데이터로 살펴본 한미 평화관계: 2017-2020(ROK-US peace relations examined through big data: 2017-2020)]. JPI Policy Forum, 2021, no. 239, pp. 2-3.
이지은(Lee Jieon). [우즈베키스탄 새로운 리더십과 변화(Uzbekistan’s New Leadership and Changes)]. 2019, 『Korean Journal of the Middle East Studies』, no.40(1):1, pp.1-24.
Hammond J., Weidmann N.B. [Using machine-coded event data for the micro-level study of political violence]. Research & politics, 2014, no. 1(2), pp. 1-8.
Leetaru K., P.A Schrodt. [GDELT: Global data on events, location, and tone, 1979-2012]. ISA annual convention, San Francisco, 2013, pp. 1-49.
정승철, 2021, op. cit., 3-5.
Seoungwoo YI, Jasmine Jeong. [Time-series Analyses for Inter-Korean Relations with GDELT Data Set]. Gyeonggi Research Institute, 2020, no. 5, ; Seongwoo Yi., Jaehyoung Lim. [Dynamics of Inter-Korean Cooperation and Dispute: 2000~2020]. Dispute resolution studies review, 2021, no. 19(2), pp. 65-96. Etc.
Sotaro S.,Keita O., Fusanori I., Yuichi I. [International cooperation analysis of Asian political distance network constructed using event data]. Frontier in Physics., 2022, no. 10, pp. 1-16.
Hikmet M., Sadullah Ç. [What does “Big data” Tell? A network Analysis Approach to The Justice and Development Party’s Role Performance in The Middle East Between 2015 and 2020]. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, no. 9(1), pp. 48-72.
Yuan L., Song C., Cheng., Shen S., Chen X., Wang Y. [The cooperative and conflictual interactions between the United States, Russia and China: A quantitative analysis of event data]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, no. 30(10), pp. 1702-1720.
이한준(Lee Hanjun). [한국언론은 어떻게 신생 대통령 권력을 정당화하는가?(How Korean Press Legitimatizes New Presidential Power: Applying Max Weber’s Concept of Legitimacy and Text Mining Analysis)]. M.S. thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 2024.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Taesang Yoo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.