Secure, Privacy-Preserving FPGA-Enabled Architectures for Big Data and Cloud Services: Theory, Methods, and Integrated Design Principles
Keywords:
FPGA security, privacy-preserving computing, garbled circuits, isolation primitivesAbstract
This article presents an original, integrative, and publication-ready examination of secure, privacy-preserving architectures that leverage Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) for big data processing and cloud services. Drawing strictly from the provided references, the work synthesizes prior theoretical contributions, design primitives, and applied systems into a cohesive framework for understanding how reconfigurable hardware can be used to meet confidentiality, integrity, and availability goals while enabling scalable high-performance computation in multi-tenant and cloud settings. The abstract outlines key objectives, methodological approach, primary results, and implications. First, we concisely state the motivation: massive datasets and computational workloads require hardware acceleration, yet introduce new attack surfaces and privacy concerns in cloud and shared infrastructures (Hong et al., 2018; Huffmire et al., 2008). Second, the methodological approach is a normative synthesis of architectural primitives (isolation, memory policy enforcement, and secure accelerators), cryptographic overlay techniques (garbled circuits and privacy-preserving MAC on FPGA), and system-level strategies for trust management and tenancy (Huffmire et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2019; Hussain et al., 2018). Third, primary findings emphasize that combining spatial and temporal isolation primitives (Moats and Drawbridges), enforced memory policies, and hardware-accelerated cryptographic protocols can yield systems that deliver both performance and measurable privacy benefits in cloud-scale deployments (Huffmire et al., 2007; Huffmire et al., 2008; Hong et al., 2018). Fourth, the article contributes a unified theoretical taxonomy, an extended method for mapping dataflow to secure FPGA fabrics, and a set of concrete design recommendations for architects and cloud operators. The discussion addresses trade-offs, limitations, and a roadmap for integrating zero-trust tenancy with reconfigurable hardware accelerators, while the conclusion distills actionable design axioms. The analysis aims to guide future empirical evaluations and stimulate development of secure FPGA-enabled cloud services that are both performant and privacy-aware.
References
Boeui Hong, Han-Yee Kim, Minsu Kim, Taeweon Suh, Lei Xu, and Weidong Shi. 2018. FASTEN: An FPGA-based secure system for big data processing. IEEE Design Test 35, 1 (2018), 30–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2017.2741464
Kai Huang, Mehmet Gungor, Xin Fang, Stratis Ioannidis, and Miriam Leeser. 2019. Garbled circuits in the cloud using FPGA enabled nodes. Proceedings of the IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC ’19), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC.2019.8916407
T. Huffmire, B. Brotherton, T. Sherwood, R. Kastner, T. Levin, T. D. Nguyen, and C. Irvine. 2008. Managing security in FPGA-based embedded systems. IEEE Design Test of Computers 25, 6 (2008), 590–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MDT.2008.166
T. Huffmire, B. Brotherton, G. Wang, T. Sherwood, R. Kastner, T. Levin, T. Nguyen, and C. Irvine. 2007. Moats and drawbridges: An isolation primitive for reconfigurable hardware based systems. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP ’07), 281–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2007.28
Ted Huffmire, Timothy Sherwood, Ryan Kastner, and Timothy Levin. 2008. Enforcing memory policy specifications in reconfigurable hardware. Computers & Security 27, 5–6 (October 2008), 197–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2008.05.002
Siam U. Hussain, Bita Darvish Rouhani, Mohammad Ghasemzadeh, and Farinaz Koushanfar. 2018. MAXelerator: FPGA accelerator for privacy preserving multiply-accumulate (MAC) on cloud servers. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC ’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 33, 6 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3195970.3196074
V. M. Reddy and L. N. Nalla. 2020. The Impact of Big Data on Supply Chain Optimization in Ecommerce. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations 1, 2 (2020), 1–20.
L. N. Nalla and V. M. Reddy. 2020. Comparative Analysis of Modern Database Technologies in Ecommerce Applications. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations 1, 2 (2020), 21–39.
D. Joshi, F. Sayed, J. Beri, and R. Pal. 2021. An efficient supervised machine learning model approach for forecasting of renewable energy to tackle climate change. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology Research 11 (2021), 25–32.
D. Joshi, F. Sayed, A. Saraf, A. Sutaria, and S. Karamchandani. 2021. Elements of Nature Optimized into Smart Energy Grids using Machine Learning. Design Engineering (2021), 1886–1892.
D. Joshi, A. Parikh, R. Mangla, F. Sayed, and S. Karamchandani. 2021. AI Based Nose for Trace of Churn in Assessment of Captive Customers. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 12, 6 (2021).
Khambati. 2021. Innovative Smart Water Management System Using Artificial Intelligence. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 12, 3 (2021), 4726–4734.
Khambaty, D. Joshi, F. Sayed, K. Pinto, and S. Karamchandani. 2022. Delve into the Realms with 3D Forms: Visualization System Aid Design in an IOT-Driven World. Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communication: ICWiCom 2021 (2022), 335–343.
L. Doddipatla, R. Ramadugu, R. R. Yerram, and T. Sharma. 2021. Exploring The Role of Biometric Authentication in Modern Payment Solutions. International Journal of Digital Innovation 2, 1 (2021).
S. K. Singu. 2021. Real-Time Data Integration: Tools, Techniques, and Best Practices. ESP Journal of Engineering & Technology Advancements 1, 1 (2021), 158–172.
R. Hariharan. 2025. Zero trust security in multi-tenant cloud environments. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management 10 (2025).
T. Basu and J. K. R. Sastry. 2020. Strengthening Authentication within Open Stack Cloud Computing System through Federation with ADDS System. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research 8, 1 (2020), 213–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/29812020
J. K. R. Sastry and M. TrinathBasu. 2020. Multi-Factor Authentication through Integration with IMS System. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research 8, 1 (2020), 88–113.
J. K. R. Sastry, K. Sai Abhigna, R. Samuel, and D. B. K. Kamesh. 2017. Architectural models for fault tolerance within clouds at the infrastructure level. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 12, 11 (2017), 3463–3469.
D. B. K. Kamesh, J. K. R. Sastry, Ch. Devi Anusha, P. Padmini, and G. Siva Anjaneyulu. 2016. Building Fault Tolerance within Clouds at Network Level. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) 6, 4 (2016), 1560–1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v6i4.10676
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John M. Aldridge (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.