Open Access

Analyzing Transparency in Prediction Approaches for Power Regulation Trading Systems

4 Department of Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Systems College of Computer Engineering King Fahd University of Technology Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
4 Department of Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems Faculty of Information Technology United Arab Emirates University Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Prediction-driven decision systems play a crucial role in modern automated environments where dynamic conditions require real-time adaptation, accuracy, and reliability. In complex computational frameworks, transparency and interpretability of predictive models have become essential requirements, particularly in systems where autonomous decision-making affects safety, performance, and operational stability. This study investigates transparency in prediction approaches used in regulation-based computational environments, focusing on algorithmic structures, feature extraction strategies, dynamic scene interpretation, and model reliability under changing conditions. Although predictive modeling techniques have achieved high accuracy, many modern approaches rely on deep learning and hybrid optimization mechanisms that reduce interpretability, making it difficult to evaluate system behavior in uncertain scenarios.

Recent research in dynamic environment perception, feature fusion, semantic modeling, and motion detection demonstrates that prediction performance strongly depends on the ability of the system to correctly interpret complex input data and distinguish between static and dynamic components. Studies on feature-based modeling, semantic filtering, probabilistic association, and motion-aware estimation have shown that prediction quality improves when models integrate structured information rather than relying solely on raw data patterns. However, these improvements often increase system complexity and reduce transparency, creating a trade-off between performance and explainability.

This paper provides a comprehensive analytical investigation of transparency in prediction approaches by examining theoretical foundations, architectural design principles, semantic integration methods, feature-level reasoning, probabilistic modeling, and dynamic environment adaptation strategies. A structured evaluation framework is proposed to analyze how different prediction architectures influence interpretability, robustness, and decision reliability. The study also compares classical feature-based approaches, semantic-aware models, deep learning-based prediction methods, and hybrid optimization techniques in terms of transparency, computational cost, and stability.

The results demonstrate that transparent prediction systems require a balance between model complexity and explainability, where structured feature representation, semantic constraints, and probabilistic reasoning significantly improve interpretability without sacrificing accuracy. The findings highlight the importance of designing prediction architectures that support both high performance and analytical clarity, ensuring reliable operation in dynamic and uncertain environments. This research contributes to the development of interpretable prediction frameworks that enable trustworthy decision-making in advanced regulation-driven computational systems.

Keywords

References

📄 M S BAHRAINI, M BOZORG, A BRAD. SLAM in Dynamic Environments via ML-RANSAC [J]. Mechatronics, 2018, 49 : 105–118.
📄 B BESCOS, J M FACIL, J CIVERA, et. al. DynaSLAM: Tracking, Mapping, and Inpainting in Dynamic Scenes [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3 ( 4 ): 4076–4083.
📄 B BESCOS, C CAMPOS, J D TARDOS, et. al. DynaSLAM II: Tightly-Coupled Multi-object Tracking and SLAM [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6 ( 3 ): 5191–5198.
📄 C CAMPOS, R ELVIRA, J J G RODRIGUEZ, et. al. ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial, and Multimap SLAM [J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2021, 37 ( 6 ): 1874–1890.
📄 Y M CHANG, J HU, S Y XU. OTE-SLAM: An Object Tracking Enhanced Visual’ SLAM System for Dynamic Environments [J]. Sensors, 2023, 23 ( 18 ): 7921.
📄 W QIAN, J S PENG, H Y ZHANG. DFD-SLAM: Visual SLAM with Deep Features in Dynamic Environment [J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14 ( 11 ): 4949.
📄 H GONG, L GONG, T B MA, et. al. AHY-SLAM: Toward Faster and More Accurate Visual SLAM in Dynamic Scenes Using Homogenized Feature Extraction and Object Detection Method [J]. Sensors, 2023, 23 ( 9 ): 4241.
📄 F B GAN, S Y XU, L Y JIANG, et. al. Robust Visual SLAM Algorithm Based on Target Detection and Clustering in Dynamic Scenarios [J]. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 2024, 18 : 1431897.
📄 G H LI, S L CHEN. Visual Slam in Dynamic Scenes Based on Object Tracking and Static Points Detection [J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2022, 104 ( 2 ): 33.
📄 Q LIU, J YUAN, B F KUANG. SIA-SLAM: A Robust Visual SLAM Associated with Semantic Information in Dynamic Environments [J]. Multimedia Tools and Application, 2024, 83 ( 18 ): 53531–53547.
📄 Y J MA, J H LV, J WEI. High-Precision Visual SLAM for Dynamic Scenes Using Semantic-Geometric Feature Filtering and NeRF Maps [J]. Electronics, 2025, 14 ( 18 ): 3657.
📄 M Y HE, C ZENG, N WANG, et. al. Adaptive Motion State Detecting and Switching for Objects in Intermittent Dynamic Scenes [C] // 2025 30th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC). Loughborough, United Kingdom : IEEE, 2025 : 1–6.
📄 Q UL ISLAM, H IBRAHIM, P K CHIN, et. al. FADM-SLAM: A Fast and Accurate Dynamic Intelligent Motion SLAM for Autonomous Robot Exploration Involving Movable Objects [J]. Robotic Intelligence and Automation, 2023, 43 ( 3 ): 254–266.
📄 A KIRILLOV, E MINTUN, N RAVI, et. al. Segment anything [C] // 2023 IEEE/CVF International Computer Vision (ICCV). Paris, France : IEEE, 2023 : 3992–4003.
📄 C Z YAO, L DING, Y H LAN. MOR-SLAM: A New Visual SLAM System for Indoor Dynamic Environments Based on Mask Restoration [J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11 ( 19 ): 4037.
📄 M L YIN, Y QIN, J S PENG. DKP-SLAM: A Visual SLAM for Dynamic Indoor Scenes Based on Object Detection and Region Probability [J]. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 82 ( 1 ): 1329–1347.
📄 J W SONG, R ZHANG, Q C ZHU, et. al. BDIS-SLAM: A Lightweight CPU-Based Dense Stereo SLAM for Surgery [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2024, 19 ( 5 ): 811–820.
📄 S SONG, H LIM, A J LEE, et. al. DynaVINS: A Visual-Inertial SLAM for Dynamic Environments [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7 ( 4 ): 11523–11530.
📄 J STURM, N ENGELHARD, F ENDRES, et. al. A Benchmark for the Evaluation of RGB-D SLAM Systems [C] // 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Vilamoura-Algave, Portugal : IEEE, 2012 : 573–580.
📄 Y X SUN, M LIU, M Q MENG. Motion Removal for Reliable RGB-D SLAM in Dynamic Environments [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2018, 108 : 115–128.
📄 Y W XIU, X LIANG, G D CHEN. STSLAM: Robust Visual SLAM in Dynamic Scenes via Image Segmentation and Instance Tracking [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2025, 194 : 105150.
📄 X Q WANG, S Y ZHENG, X H LIN, et. al. Improving RGB-D SLAM Accuracy in Dynamic Environments Based on Semantic and Geometric Constraints [J]. Measurement, 217 : 113084.
📄 K S WANG, X F YAO, N F MA, et. al. PLMOT-SLAM: A Point-Line Features Fusion SLAM System with Moving Object Tracking [J]. The Visual Computer, 2025, 41 ( 7 ): 4547–4565.
📄 K S WANG, X F YAO, F N MA, et. al. DMOT-SLAM: Visual SLAM in Dynamic Environments with Moving Object Tracking [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2024, 35 ( 9 ): 096302.
📄 E PALAZZOLO, J BEHLEY, P LOTTES, et. al. ReFusion: 3D Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments for RGB-D Cameras Exploiting Residuals [C] // 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Macau, China : IEEE 2019 : 7855–7862.
📄 R SCONA, M JAIMEZ, Y R PETILLOT, et. al. StaticFusion: Background Reconstruction for Dense RGB- D SLAM in Dynamic Environments [C] // 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Brisbane, QLD, Australia : IEEE 2018 : 3849–3856.
📄 C Y RUAN, Q Y ZANG, K H ZHANG, et. al. DN-SLAM: A Visual SLAM with ORB Features and NeRF Mapping in Dynamic Environments [J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024, 24 ( 4 ): 5279–5287.
📄 C YU, Z X LIU, X J LIU, et. al. DS-SLAM: A Semantic Visual SLAM Towards Dynamic Environments [C] // 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Madrid, Spain : IEEE 2018 : 1168–1174.
📄 J B ZHANG, L YUAN, T RAN, et. al. A Dynamic Detection and Data Association Method Based on Probabilistic Models for Visual SLAM [J]. Displays, 2024, 82 : 102663.
📄 H W ZHU, S Q BAI, J L SHI, et. al. Ellipsoid-SLAM: Enhancing Dynamic Scene Understanding Through Ellip-soidal Object Representation and Trajectory Tracking [J]. The Visual Computer, 2025, 41 ( 10 ): 7493–7508.
📄 X R ZHAO, P WANG, E H WEI, et. al. Semantically Constrained SLAM Using Reliable Object Landmarks in Dynamic Vehicle Environments [J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025, 74 : 1–15.
📄 M L ZHONG, C Y HONG, Z Q JIA, et. al. DynaTM-SLAM: Fast Filtering of Dynamic Feature Points and Object-Based Localization in Dynamic Indoor Environments [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2024, 174 : 104634.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.