Open Access

Comparison of The Effectiveness of Various Types of Connections (Rigid, Hinged, Semi-Rigid) In Steel Systems, Depending on The Height and Span of The Building

4 Structural Engineer Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the comparative evaluation of rigid, hinged, and semi-rigid beam-to-column connections in steel frame systems, depending on building height and span. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing demand for optimized structural solutions that ensure stability, seismic resistance,e and economic efficiency in multi-storey steel construction. Scientific novelty lies in the system-level comparison of connection typologies through stiffness normalization and deformation sensitivity thresholds rather than isolated strength assessment. The work describes the influence of fixity-factor variation on column resistance and drift amplification and studies the transition of governing structural mechanisms from strength-dominated to deformation-controlled behavior. Special attention is paid to stiffness deviation tolerance and its impact on multi-storey sway frames. The aim of the study is to establish quantitative stiffness and deformation thresholds that define rational application domains for rigid, semi-rigid, and hinged connections in steel frame systems. Comparative analysis, source synthesis, and analytical evaluation methods are used to solve this problem. The conclusion describes structural thresholds that redefine connection selection as a system-level optimization task. The article will be useful for structural engineers, designers, and researchers in steel construction.

Keywords

References

📄 Elhout, E. (2022). Location of semi-rigid connections effect on the seismic performance of steel frame structures. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 22(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.223113
📄 Jia, B., Zhang, W., Wu, T., Wang, Y., & Yu, S. (2022). Experimental study of the seismic behavior of a prefabricated low-rise steel frame structure with hinged joints. Buildings, 12(12), 2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122088
📄 Kukla, D., & Kozlowski, A. (2023). Numerical study of the robustness of steel frames with bolted end-plate joints subjected to sudden and gradual internal column loss. International Journal of Steel Structures, 23, 1211–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00761-z
📄 Morelli, F., Panzera, I., & Salvatore, W. (2021). Mechanical model of steel frames with reinforced concrete infill walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19, 2125–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01066-4
📄 Naqash, M. T., Alluqmani, A. E., & Farooq, Q. U. (2024). A comparative analysis of design and analysis methods for steel connections: Contrasting American and European perspectives. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 15, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-023-00037-x
📄 Venneri, G. A., Di Girolamo, G. G., Memmo, I., Brando, G., & De Matteis, G. (2023). Seismic performance of multi-storey steel frames with semi-rigid joints. Procedia Structural Integrity, 44, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.038
📄 Wrzesien, A., McCrum, D. P., Mishra, S., Broderick, B. M., & Lim, J. B. P. (2023). Lateral resistance performance evaluation of cold-formed steel zero-tolerance bolted moment-resisting frames. Structures, 50, 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.051
📄 Yin, T., Wang, Z., Pan, J., Zheng, K., Liu, D., & Lu, S. (2022). A design method for semi-rigid steel frame via pre-established performance-based connection database. Buildings, 12(10), 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101634
📄 Yin, T., Wang, Z., Zheng, K., & Lu, S. (2022). A new method for design of the semi-rigid steel frame—The integration of joint inverse design and structural design. Buildings, 12(7), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12070938

Similar Articles

1-10 of 66

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.