Open Access

Deep Learning for Continuous Auditing & Real-Time Assurance

4 Department of Governance, Risk and Compliance, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan and University of Salford, Mawarid Holding Investment, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

This paper develops and validates an architectural approach for continuous auditing and real-time assurance using deep learning methods, with emphasis on practical implementation in corporate environments. Employing design science research methodology combined with action research, the study examines limitations of traditional sample-based auditing in high-volume digital environments and substantiates the transition to full-population monitoring. Central attention is given to deep learning as a structural element enabling anomaly detection, risk-event ranking, and manageable expert review. Implementation across a diversified holding company processing 2.4 million annual transactions demonstrates that practical effectiveness is determined not by maximizing individual model accuracy, but by architectural integration into a unified audit loop comprising data, analytical, and assurance layers with mandatory auditor involvement. Results show cycle time reduction from 45 days to under 72 hours and 60% reallocation of audit resources from manual testing to exception investigation. Institutional constraints including trust, interpretability, and regulatory clarity are examined. The article contributes to internal audit practice and research on AI-enabled assurance systems.

Keywords

References

📄 ACFE. (2024). Report to the Nations: 2024 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. https://legacy.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024/
📄 Alles, M., Brennan, G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2006). Continuous monitoring of business process controls. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2005.10.004
📄 Bhattacharya, I., & Mickovic, A. (2024). Accounting fraud detection using contextual language learning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100682
📄 Binh, N. T. T. (2025). Transforming auditing in the AI era: A comprehensive review. Information, 16(5), 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050400
📄 Chen, Y., Wu, Z., & Yan, H. (2022). A full population auditing method based on machine learning. Sustainability, 14(24), 17008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417008
📄 Ding, K., Lev, B., Peng, X., Sun, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2020). Machine learning improves accounting estimates. Review of Accounting Studies, 25, 1098–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09541-3
📄 Genaro-Moya, D., Lopez-Hernandez, A. M., & Godz, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public sector auditing. World, 6(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020078
📄 Huang, F., No, W. G., Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Yan, Z. (2022). Audit data analytics, machine learning, and full population testing. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 8, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2022.05.002
📄 Kokina, J., Blanchette, S., Davenport, T. H., & Pachamanova, D. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56, 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100734
📄 Leocadio, D., Malheiro, L., & Reis, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in auditing: A conceptual framework. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100238
📄 Mashiko, S., et al. (2025). Anomaly detection in double-entry bookkeeping data by federated learning system. Scientific Reports, 15, 42208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26120-y
📄 Minkkinen, M., Laine, J., & Mantymaki, M. (2022). Continuous auditing of artificial intelligence. Digital Society, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00022-2
📄 Mokander, J., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics-based auditing to develop trustworthy AI. Minds and Machines, 31, 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09557-8
📄 Schreyer, M., Sattarov, T., Borth, D., Dengel, A., & Reimer, B. (2017). Detection of anomalies in large-scale accounting data using deep autoencoder networks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05254
📄 Sutton, S. G., Holt, M., & Arnold, V. (2016). Artificial intelligence research in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 22, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.03.002
📄 Vasarhelyi, M. A., Alles, M. G., & Williams, K. T. (2010). Business measurement and assurance in the age of the Internet. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta.2010.7.1.1
📄 Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Halper, F. B. (1991). The continuous audit of online systems. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.2308/auditing.1991.10.1.110
📄 Wang, X., Sun, F., Kim, M. G., & Na, H. J. (2025). Developing a novel audit risk metric through sentiment analysis. Sustainability, 17(6), 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062460

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.