Open Access

Multisided Digital Platforms in the Sphere of Family Well-Being: Models for Balancing the Interests of Children, Parents, and Service Providers Under Regulatory Requirements for the Protection of Minors

PDF

Mykola Nesvietaiev ¹ ,

⁴ Business owner, CreationJoy Art LLC Brooklyn, New York

Abstract

This study examines the evolutionary trajectories and governance instruments of multisided digital platforms designed to support different dimensions of family well-being. Against the backdrop of the rapid expansion of the FemTech and EdTech segments, whose scale in 2024-2025 reached threshold levels, there emerges a clear demand for conceptual schemes capable of reconciling the commercial priorities of providers with the right of parents to exercise their educational and caregiving functions, and with children’s fundamental rights to safety and privacy. Methodologically, the study is grounded in a comparison of international regulatory practices, including the British Age-Appropriate Design Code and California’s AB-2273, both of which entrench the logic of Safety by Design. Within the article, an integrative model of interest alignment is substantiated, built on the premises of behavioral design and on architectural patterns of API governance. The findings indicate that the resilience of family-oriented digital ecosystems is determined not by the intensification of repressive control, but by the institutionalization of regimes of “managed autonomy,” sustained through algorithmic transparency and the principled minimization of personal data extraction. Particular emphasis is placed on the fact that, by 2025, digital well-being acquires the status of a product of distributed responsibility shared by all parties involved in platform-mediated interaction.

Keywords

multisided digital platforms, family well-being, protection of minors, Age-Appropriate Design Code, FemTech, EdTech, behavioral design, balancing of interests, digital safety

References

Femtech Market Report 2025. (2025). Research and Markets. Retrieved from: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5767489/femtech-market-report (date accessed: March 1, 2025).

Educational Technology Market Size to Hit USD 572.08 Billion by 2034. (2024). Precedence Research. Retrieved from: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/educational-technology-market (date accessed: January 6, 2025).

Education Technology Market Size | Industry Report, 2030. (2024). Grand View Research. Retrieved from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/education-technology-market (date accessed: January 9, 2025).

Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Multiple-case analysis on governance mechanisms of multi-sided platforms. Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2160.0884

Sharpe, M., Bowen, M., & Lambiotte, R. (2025). Quantifying digital habits. EPJ Data Science, 14, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00581-7

Eyal, N., & Hoover, R. (2014). Hooked: How to build habit-forming products.

Radesky, J., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Advocating for a child-centered digital environment. ZERO TO THREE Journal, 35(4), 30–37.

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2024). Balancing online safety and independence: Parental monitoring by age. Retrieved from: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/media-and-children/center-of-excellence-on-social-media-and-youth-mental-health/qa-portal/qa-portal-library/qa-portal-library-questions/balancing-online-safety-and-independence-parental-monitoring-by-age/ (date accessed: January 13, 2025).

Köhler-Dauner, F., Peter, L., Sitarski, E., Chauviré-Geib, K., Haag, A.-C., & Fegert, J. M. (2025). Digital child protection in social networks: Age verification and age-tiered regulation in Europe. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 19, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-025-01016-x

Understanding the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (AB 2273). (2024). TrustArc. Retrieved from: https://trustarc.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code-act/ (date accessed: January 17, 2025).

Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Multi-sided platforms: A literature review and research agenda. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.

Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2024). Leveraging digital platforms to enhance global agrifood systems resilience: Implications for social sustainability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i2/24642

Saha, S., Mani, V., & Goyal, S. (2024). Theories of digital platforms for supply chain management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 54(5), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2023-0037

FemTech Market Size, Share & Growth Analysis Report 2030. (2024). Grand View Research. Retrieved from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/femtech-market-report (date accessed: January 21, 2025).

Femtech Market Size, Share, Trends & Value | Growth [2034]. (2024). Fortune Business Insights. Retrieved from: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/femtech-market-107413 (date accessed: January 24, 2025).

K-12 Education Technology (EdTech) Market Size to Reach USD 908.1 bn by 2034. (2024). Dimension Market Research. Retrieved from: https://dimensionmarketresearch.com/report/k-12-education-technology-edtech-market/ (date accessed: January 28, 2025).

Trends Shaping Education 2025. (2025). OECD. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/trends-shaping-education-2025_ee6587fd-en.html (date accessed: February 18, 2025).

Singh, B., Ugalde, A., Maher, C., et al. (2025). Lifestyle eHealth and mHealth interventions for children and adolescents: Systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e69065. https://doi.org/10.2196/69065

Fogg, B. J. (2024). BJ Fogg, PhD – Behavior scientist & author of Tiny Habits. Retrieved from: https://www.bjfogg.com/learn (date accessed: February 2, 2025).

Stanford Center for Digital Health. (2025). Youth safety and digital wellbeing report 2025. Stanford University. Retrieved from: https://cdh.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj29486/files/media/file/youth_safety_and_digital_wellbeing_report_2025.pdf(date accessed: March 3, 2025).

Information Systems Education Journal. (2023). ISEDJ, 21(5). Retrieved from: https://isedj.org/2023-21/n5/ISEDJv21n5.pdf (date accessed: February 6, 2025).

EdTech and Smart Classrooms Market | Industry Report, 2033. (2024). Grand View Research. Retrieved from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/edtech-smart-classrooms-market-report (date accessed: February 10, 2025).

Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2025). Sustainable governance of digital platform ecosystem: A life cycle perspective through multiple governance parties. Sustainability, 17(8), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083628

North America Primary EdTech Market Size | CAGR of 14.2%. (2024). Market.us. Retrieved from: https://market.us/report/north-america-primary-edtech-market/ (date accessed: February 14, 2025).

Standards of age appropriate design. (2020). Information Commissioner’s Office. Retrieved from: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/childrens-information/childrens-code-guidance-and-resources/age-appropriate-design-a-code-of-practice-for-online-services/standards-of-age-appropriate-design/ (date accessed: February 17, 2025).

Özkul, D., Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2025). Best interests of the child in relation to the digital environment. UNICEF Innocenti. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/best-interests-child-relation-digital-environment(date accessed: February 26, 2025).

Radesky, J., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2024). Parental monitoring of early adolescent social technology use in the US: A mixed-method study. Retrieved from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12227363/ (date accessed: February 27, 2025).

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2024). Parental controls & digital monitoring. Retrieved from: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/media-and-children/center-of-excellence-on-social-media-and-youth-mental-health/qa-portal/qa-portal-library/qa-portal-library-questions/parental-controls--digital-monitoring/ (date accessed: March 4, 2025).

Joint Research Centre. (2024). JRC science for digital wellbeing. European Commission. Retrieved from: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/jrc-science-digital-wellbeing_en (date accessed: March 8, 2025).

Save the Children. (2025). Click, scroll, connect – and balance: Children’s digital wellbeing in educational contexts across Europe. Retrieved from: https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/click-scroll-connect-and-balance-childrens-digital-wellbeing-in-educational-contexts-across-europe-2025 (date accessed: March 9, 2025).

National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2024). Recommended practices for industry: Online health and safety for children and youth. Retrieved from: https://www.ntia.gov/report/2024/kids-online-health-and-safety/online-health-and-safety-for-children-and-youth/taskforce-guidance/recommended-practices-for-industry (date accessed: March 12, 2025).

Arampatzakis, V., Kalovrektis, K., Katos, V., et al. (2025). Towards reshaping children’s habits: Vitalia’s AR-gamified approach. Information, 16(7), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070606

Wang, X., & Lee, J. (2022). Tiny Habits® for gratitude: Implications for healthcare education stakeholders. Healthcare, 10(6), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061048

Hartford, A., & Stein, D. J. (2022). Addiction, autonomy, and the Internet: Some ethical considerations. In Mental health in a digital world (pp. 481–495).

Gondiawati, N., & Nurhayati, S. (2024). Child-centered learning in the home environment: Implementation and challenges. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 7(1), 13–23.

Khan, A., Patel, R., & Singh, M. (2025). Systematic review of API gateway patterns for scalable and secure application architecture. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30273.48485

Chandramouli, R. (2025). Guidelines for API protection for cloud-native systems (NIST Special Publication 800-228). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-228

Ahmad, M., Geewax, J. J., Macvean, A., Karger, D. R., & Ma, K.-L. (2024). API governance at scale. In Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (pp. 430–440). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639477.3639713

OWASP Foundation. (2023). OWASP Top 10 API Security Risks – 2023. Retrieved from: https://owasp.org/API-Security/editions/2023/en/0x11-t10/ (date accessed: March 15, 2025)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >>

International Journal of Modern Computer Science and IT Innovations

Multisided Digital Platforms in the Sphere of Family Well-Being: Models for Balancing the Interests of Children, Parents, and Service Providers Under Regulatory Requirements for the Protection of Minors

Abstract

Keywords

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles