Open Access

Cloud Computing AsInfrastructural ESG Capital: Strategic Implications For Corporate Sustainability

4 University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The convergence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) imperatives with the accelerating digitization of business infrastructure has created a new frontier in corporate strategy, one in which information technology is no longer a neutral operational backbone but an active determinant of sustainability performance. Among digital infrastructure choices, the shift from traditional on-premise hosting to cloud-based architectures represents one of the most consequential yet theoretically underexplored transformations in the ESG domain. While the ESG literature has primarily focused on financial markets, disclosure regimes, and organizational behavior, the infrastructural substrate through which firms operationalize sustainability remains under-theorized. This article responds to this gap by developing a comprehensive, interdisciplinary framework for understanding cloud computing as an ESG-enabling technology. Drawing upon financial, organizational, governance, and sustainability literatures, it positions cloud infrastructure not merely as a cost-saving or efficiency-enhancing tool but as a strategic ESG lever that reshapes firms’ environmental footprints, social accountability mechanisms, and governance architectures.

The study is grounded in a synthesis of contemporary ESG scholarship and digital infrastructure research, integrating insights from sustainability-performance linkages (Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim, 2014), ESG valuation and profitability studies (Alareeni and Hamdan, 2020; Aydoğmuş, Gülay, and Ergun, 2022), and the emerging ESG footprint literature in technology-intensive sectors (Egorova, Grishunin, and Karminsky, 2022). Central to the conceptual framework is the argument that cloud computing represents a structural reconfiguration of corporate resource allocation, risk management, and disclosure systems. In contrast to traditional hosting, which embeds firms in capital-intensive, carbon-heavy, and operationally opaque infrastructures, cloud platforms externalize hardware ownership, centralize energy efficiency, and embed firms in sophisticated governance ecosystems governed by standardized reporting, cybersecurity protocols, and real-time monitoring capabilities. This transformation, it is argued, creates material advantages across all three ESG pillars.

The analysis places particular emphasis on the strategic ESG case for cloud adoption articulated by Goel and Bhatiya (2025), who demonstrate that cloud infrastructure enables superior environmental efficiency, more transparent and auditable governance systems, and more resilient social responsibility mechanisms when compared with traditional hosting environments. Their work is integrated into a broader theoretical discussion of how ESG-aligned technologies alter firm valuation, stakeholder trust, and long-term competitiveness, extending empirical findings from financial markets into the infrastructural domain. The article further situates cloud computing within global sustainability governance architectures, including emerging carbon markets (Climate Impact X, 2021), regional green policy frameworks (Flo Energy Singapore, 2021), and multilateral sustainability discourses (Francisco and Björn-Ola, 2023; ASEAN, 2025).

Methodologically, the paper adopts a qualitative, theory-driven integrative review approach, synthesizing empirical and conceptual studies across finance, sustainability, information systems, and governance. Rather than treating ESG and digital infrastructure as separate analytical domains, the study constructs a unified framework that explains how infrastructure choices mediate the relationship between ESG commitments and financial performance. The results reveal that firms adopting cloud-based infrastructure exhibit structurally superior ESG profiles due to reduced carbon intensity, enhanced data governance, and improved stakeholder transparency, which in turn strengthens firm value and investor confidence, consistent with the financial ESG literature (Ahmad, Mobarek, and Roni, 2021; Bani-Harouni, Hommel, and Paetzold, 2023).

The discussion advances a new theoretical proposition: that cloud computing constitutes a form of “infrastructural ESG capital,” a long-term strategic asset that embeds sustainability, accountability, and resilience into the operational fabric of the firm. This concept challenges conventional ESG measurement models that focus on outputs and disclosures rather than the technological architectures that make those outcomes possible. By reframing digital infrastructure as a core ESG determinant, the article opens new pathways for research on sustainable digital transformation, investor evaluation, and regulatory governance. It concludes by outlining future research directions that integrate cloud economics, ESG analytics, and sustainable finance into a unified field of inquiry.

Keywords

References

📄 Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127.
📄 Flo Energy Singapore. (2021). SG Green Plan 2030 | Flo Energy. https://floenergy.sg/business/guide/how-the-singapore-green-plan-2030-is-shaping-a-greener-future
📄 Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N.N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1900500.
📄 Bell, D.A., & Llewellyn, R.C. (2022). Best practices for establishing ESG disclosure controls and oversight. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corp-gov.law.harvard.edu/2022/02/03/best-practices-for-establishing-esg-disclosure-controls-and-oversight/
📄 Francisco, M., & Björn-Ola, L. (2023). AI and the governance of sustainable development. An idea analysis of the European Union, the United Nations, and the World Economic Forum. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103590
📄 Dragomir, V.D., Bătae, O.M., Ionescu, B.Ș., & Ionescu-Feleagă, L. (2022). The influence of ESG factors on financial performance in the banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 56(4), 71-88.
📄 Egorova, A.A., Grishunin, S.V., &Karminsky, A.M. (2022). The impact of ESG factors on the performance of information technology companies. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 339-345.
📄 Alda, M. (2021). The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimension of firms in which socially responsible investment (SRI) and conventional pension funds invest: The mainstream SRI and the ESG inclusion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126812.
📄 Aich, S., Thakur, A., Nanda, D., Tripathy, S., & Kim, H.C. (2021). Factors affecting ESG towards impact on investment: A structural approach. Sustainability, 13(19), 10868.
📄 Alareeni, B.A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409-1428.
📄 Bani-Harouni, N., Hommel, U., &Paetzold, F. (2023). ESG footprints in private equity portfolios: Unpacking management instruments and financial performance. SSRN 4627273.
📄 Goel, V., &Bhatiya, A. (2025). Redefining infrastructure: The strategic ESG case for cloud over traditional hosting. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(8), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue08-10
📄 Climate Impact X. (2021). Home. www.climateimpactx.com
📄 Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I., &Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
📄 ASEAN. (2025). About ASEAN. https://asean.org/about-asean/
📄 Escrig-Olmedo, E., Rivera-Lirio, J.M., Muñoz-Torres, M., & Fernández-Izquierdo, M.Á. (2017). Integrating multiple ESG investors' preferences into sustainable investment: A fuzzy multicriteria methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1334-1345.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 33

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.