eISSN: 3087-4297 editor@aimjournals.com
All Journals
Submit your article

International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Study of Threat Evaluation and Forecasting Framework for Communication Infrastructure Using Neural Intelligence Techniques

DOI
PDF
Dr. Arben Kola 1 , Dr. Elira Hoxha 1 , Dr. Gentian Leka 1 ,
4 Department of Computer Engineering Faculty of Information Technology Polytechnic University of Tirana, Albania
4 Department of Cyber Security and Networking Faculty of Natural Sciences University of Tirana, Albania
4 Department of Secure Communication Systems Faculty of Information and Communication Technology Aleksandër Moisiu University Durrës, Albania

Abstract

Modern communication infrastructure has become the backbone of digital society, supporting critical services including cloud computing, Internet of Things (IoT), industrial automation, wireless networks, and cyber-physical systems. The rapid expansion of these technologies has significantly increased the attack surface, making network environments highly vulnerable to sophisticated cyber threats. Traditional security monitoring mechanisms rely on rule-based or signature-based detection approaches, which are insufficient for identifying unknown, dynamic, and adaptive attacks. Therefore, there is a growing need for intelligent threat evaluation and predictive security frameworks capable of analyzing large-scale network data and forecasting potential security risks before they occur. Recent advances in neural intelligence techniques, including deep learning, generative models, federated learning, and adversarial machine learning, provide powerful tools for analyzing complex patterns in communication systems and improving cybersecurity resilience.

This research proposes a comprehensive threat evaluation and forecasting framework for communication infrastructure using neural intelligence techniques. The framework integrates multi-layer threat monitoring, feature extraction, deep neural analysis, and predictive risk modeling to detect anomalies and forecast future attack scenarios. The proposed model combines deep learning-based intrusion detection, adversarial threat analysis, and predictive security assessment to enhance the reliability of communication networks. The framework also incorporates secure data processing mechanisms suitable for distributed and IoT-based environments, ensuring scalability and robustness.

The study analyzes existing research on machine learning-based cybersecurity, intrusion detection systems, federated learning security, and neural network-based threat prediction to identify limitations in current approaches. Based on these gaps, a hybrid neural intelligence architecture is designed to perform real-time threat evaluation and future risk prediction. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is examined through theoretical analysis and simulated security scenarios to demonstrate improved detection accuracy and forecasting capability.

The results indicate that neural intelligence-driven security assessment models can significantly improve threat detection efficiency and provide reliable prediction of potential cyber attacks in communication infrastructure. The proposed framework contributes to the development of intelligent, adaptive, and scalable security solutions for next-generation network environments.

Keywords

Communication Infrastructure Security, Threat Evaluation, Neural Intelligence, Deep Learning

References

📄 D. Adesina, C. C. Hsieh, Y. E. Sagduyu, and L. J. Qian, “Adversarial Machine Learning in Wireless Communications Using RF Data: A Review,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 77–100, 2023.
📄 Y. Afaq and A. Manocha, “Blockchain and Deep Learning Integration for Various Application: A Review,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 92–105, 2024.
📄 G. Agrawal, A. Kaur, and S. Myneni, “A Review of Generative Models in Generating Synthetic Attack Data for Cybersecurity,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 31, 2024.
📄 H. Ahmetoglu and R. Das, “A comprehensive review on detection of cyber-attacks: Data sets, methods, challenges, and future research directions,” Internet of Things, vol. 20, pp. 25, 2022.
📄 O. A. Alimi, K. Ouahada, and A. M. Abu-Mahfouz, “A Review of Machine Learning Approaches to Power System Security and Stability,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 113512–113531, 2020.
📄 M. A. Amanullah, “Deep learning and big data technologies for IoT security,” Computer Communications, vol. 151, pp. 495–517, 2020.
📄 R. Ameri, C. C. Hsu, and S. S. Band, “A systematic review of deep learning approaches for surface defect detection in industrial applications,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 130, pp. 24, 2024.
📄 L. Aversano, M. L. Bernardi, M. Cimitile, and R. Pecori, “A systematic review on Deep Learning approaches for IoT security,” Computer Science Review, vol. 40, pp. 18, 2021.
📄 K. Barik, S. Misra, K. Konar, L. Fernandez-Sanz, and K. Murat, “Cyber-security Deep: Approaches, Attacks Dataset, and Comparative Study,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 24, 2022.
📄 S. Bharati and P. Podder, “Machine and Deep Learning for IoT Security and Privacy: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2022, pp. 41, 2022.
📄 E. Btoush, X. J. Zhou, R. Gururajan, K. C. Chan, R. Genrich, and P. Sankaran, “A systematic review of literature on credit card cyber fraud detection using machine and deep learning,” Peerj Computer Science, vol. 9, pp. 66, 2023.
📄 J. Chen, D. D. Wu, and R. Y. Xie, “Artificial intelligence algorithms for cyberspace security applications: a technological and status review,” Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1117–1142, 2023.
📄 J. R. Cheng, Y. Yang, X. Y. Tang, N. X. Xiong, Y. Zhang, and F. F. Lei, “Generative Adversarial Networks: A Literature Review,” Ksii Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4625–4647, 2020.
📄 D. Dai and S. Boroomand, “A Review of Artificial Intelligence to Enhance the Security of Big Data Systems: State-of-Art, Methodologies, Applications, and Challenges,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1291–1309, 2022.
📄 P. Dixit and S. Silakari, “Deep Learning Algorithms for Cybersecurity Applications: A Technological and Status Review,” Computer Science Review, vol. 39, pp. 15, 2021.
📄 J. Du, Q. Wei, Y. S. Wang, and X. J. Sun, “A Review of Deep Learning-Based Binary Code Similarity Analysis,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 18, 2023.
📄 L. N. Ge, H. A. Li, X. Wang, and Z. Wang, “A review of secure federated learning: Privacy leakage threats, protection technologies, challenges and future directions,” Neurocomputing, vol. 561, pp. 18, 2023.
📄 A. Halbouni, T. S. Gunawan, M. H. Habaebi, M. Halbouni, M. Kartiwi, and R. Ahmad, “Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for CyberSecurity: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 19572–19585, 2022.
📄 J. Kaur, U. Garg, and G. Bathla, “Detection of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks using machine learning techniques: a review,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 12725–12769, 2023.
📄 A. R. Khan, M. Kashif, R. H. Jhaveri, R. Raut, T. Saba, and S. A. Bahaj, “Deep Learning for Intrusion Detection and Security of Internet of Things (IoT): Current Analysis, Challenges, and Possible Solutions,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2022, pp. 13, 2022.
📄 G. Kornaros, “Hardware-Assisted Machine Learning in Resource-Constrained IoT Environments for Security: Review and Future Prospective,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 58603–58622, 2022.
📄 C. Kumar, T. S. Bharati, and S. Prakash, “Online Social Network Security: A Comparative Review Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning,” Neural Processing Letters, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 843–861, 2021.
📄 B. Lampe and W. Z. Meng, “A survey of deep learning-based intrusion detection in automotive applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 221, pp. 23, 2023.
📄 J. Lansky, “Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems: A Systematic Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 101574–101599, 2021.
📄 S. W. Lee, “Towards secure intrusion detection systems using deep learning techniques: Comprehensive analysis and review,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 187, pp. 22, 2021.
📄 F. C. Liu, M. Li, X. X. Liu, T. Xue, J. Ren, and C. Y. Zhang, “A Review of Federated Meta-Learning and Its Application in Cyberspace Security,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 35, 2023.
📄 A. Miglani and N. Kumar, “Blockchain management and machine learning adaptation for IoT environment in 5G and beyond networks: A systematic review,” Computer Communications, vol. 178, pp. 37–63, 2021.
📄 S. Najafli, A. T. Haghighat, and B. Karasfi, “Taxonomy of deep learning-based intrusion detection system approaches in fog computing: a systematic review,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol., pp. 34, 2024.
📄 Z. T. Pritee, M. H. Anik, S. B. Alam, J. R. Jim, M. M. Kabir, and M. F. Mridha, “Machine learning and deep learning for user authentication and authorization in cybersecurity: A state-of-the-art review,” Computers & Security, vol. 140, pp. 21, 2024.
📄 K. Ramezanpour and J. Jagannath, “Intelligent zero trust architecture for 5G/6G networks: Principles, challenges, and the role of machine learning in the context of O-RAN,” Computer Networks, vol. 217, pp. 11, 2022.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.