Open Access

PROACTIVE CYBER THREAT HUNTING AND PREDICTIVE INTELLIGENCE IN CLOUD-ENABLED CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR RESILIENT DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS

4 University of Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

The exponential expansion of cloud computing, Internet of Things (IoT), and critical infrastructure digitization has fundamentally transformed the cyber risk landscape, shifting it from episodic security incidents to persistent, adaptive, and intelligence-driven adversarial campaigns. Traditional perimeter-based cybersecurity architectures, which were historically designed to detect known threats after they occur, have become increasingly ineffective against advanced persistent threats, ransomware syndicates, distributed denial-of-service attacks, and sophisticated data exfiltration operations. Contemporary cyber defense, therefore, is undergoing a paradigmatic shift from reactive incident response to proactive cyber threat hunting, predictive intelligence, and cyber resilience engineering. This research article develops a comprehensive theoretical and analytical synthesis of proactive cyber threat hunting as an integrated socio-technical capability spanning cloud infrastructure, industrial Internet of Things, and mission-critical cyber-physical systems.

Drawing strictly from established research in cyber threat intelligence, predictive security analytics, machine-learning-driven intrusion detection, blockchain-enabled trust frameworks, and cyber resilience theory, this study conceptualizes cyber threat hunting not merely as a technical activity but as a strategic, organizational, and epistemological process. By integrating the predictive cyber defense paradigms proposed in cloud protection models, proactive disaster recovery frameworks, AI-powered SIEM architectures, explainable artificial intelligence, and hybrid machine learning-metaheuristic optimization, this article establishes a unifying theory of proactive cyber defense. The theoretical framework presented demonstrates how cyber adversaries can be anticipated through behavioral modeling, threat intelligence correlation, attack surface forecasting, and continuous optimization of defensive postures.

The methodology adopts a qualitative analytical synthesis approach that maps cyber threat hunting workflows across cloud environments, IoT ecosystems, and critical infrastructure sectors. It integrates insights from hybrid intrusion detection systems, optimization-based feature selection models, ensemble machine-learning classifiers, and blockchain-enabled data integrity mechanisms. Instead of treating threat detection, threat prediction, and threat response as independent functions, the article shows how they can be unified into a continuous feedback-driven intelligence cycle that evolves in parallel with attacker strategies. Through descriptive analytical results, the article explains how proactive threat hunting can drastically reduce dwell time, limit lateral movement, and improve the explainability and trustworthiness of automated security systems.

The discussion section critically examines the limitations of current predictive cyber defense technologies, including data imbalance, adversarial machine learning, explainability gaps, operational complexity, and ethical considerations in large-scale surveillance. It further highlights how cyber resilience frameworks and hybrid optimization algorithms can compensate for uncertainty, dynamic attack surfaces, and evolving adversarial tactics. The study concludes that the future of cyber security lies not in stronger digital walls but in intelligent, adaptive, and predictive security ecosystems that continuously learn from both defensive telemetry and adversarial behavior. By synthesizing the diverse research traditions of threat intelligence, machine learning, cloud security, and cyber resilience, this article provides a theoretically grounded and operationally relevant roadmap for building proactive cyber defense in the age of digital critical infrastructure.

Keywords

References

📄 AlHidaifi, S.M.; Asghar, M.R.; Ansari, I.S. A Survey on Cyber Resilience: Key Strategies, Research Challenges, and Future Directions. ACM Computing Surveys 2024, 56, 1337–1360.
📄 Almahmoud, Z.; Yoo, P.D.; Alhussein, O.; Farhat, I.; Damiani, E. A holistic and proactive approach to forecasting cyber threats. Scientific Reports 2023, 13, 8049.
📄 Al-Sada, B.; et al. Analysis and Characterization of Cyber Threats Leveraging the MITRE ATT&CK Database. IEEE 2023.
📄 Awotunde, J.B.; Folorunso, S.O.; Imoize, A.L.; Odunuga, J.O.; Lee, C.C.; Li, C.T.; Do, D.T. An ensemble tree-based model for intrusion detection in industrial internet of things networks. Applied Sciences 2023, 13, 2479.
📄 Balyan, A.K.; Ahuja, S.; Lilhore, U.K.; Sharma, S.K.; Manoharan, P.; Algarni, A.D.; Elmannai, H.; Raahemifar, K. A hybrid intrusion detection model using ega-pso and improved random forest method. Sensors 2022, 22, 5986.
📄 Bhadra, S. Securing Cloudy Cyberspace: An Overview of Crimes, Threats and Risks. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 2020, 7.
📄 George, A.S.; Baskar, T.; Srikaanth, P.B. Cyber Threats to Critical Infrastructure: Assessing Vulnerabilities Across Key Sectors. Partnership University International Innovation Journal 2024, 2, 51–75.
📄 Gautam, A.S.; Gahlot, Y.; Kamat, P. Hacker forum exploit and classification for proactive cyber threat intelligence. In Inventive Computation Technologies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 4.
📄 Haghnegahdar, L.; Wang, Y. A whale optimization algorithm-trained artificial neural network for smart grid cyber intrusion detection. Neural Computing and Applications 2020, 32, 9427–9441.
📄 Khan, M.S.; et al. Cyber Threat Hunting: A Cognitive Endpoint Behavior Analytic System. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence 2021.
📄 Kumar, P.; Javeed, D.; Kumar, R.; Islam, A.N. Blockchain and explainable AI for enhanced decision making in cyber threat detection. Software Practice and Experience 2024, 54.
📄 Meryem, A.; Ouahidi, B.E. Hybrid intrusion detection system using machine learning. Network Security 2020, 2020, 8–19.
📄 Nuiaa, R.R.; Manickam, S.; Alsaeedi, A.H.; Alomari, E.S. A new proactive feature selection model based on the enhanced optimization algorithms to detect DRDoS attacks. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2022, 12, 869–1880.
📄 Pulyala, S.R. From Detection to Prediction: AI-powered SIEM for Proactive Threat Hunting and Risk Mitigation. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education 2024, 15, 34–43.
📄 Rathod, T.; Jadav, N.K.; Tanwar, S.; Polkowsk, Z.; Yamsa, N.; Sharm, R.; Alqahtan, F.; Gafa, A. AI and Blockchain-Based Secure Data Dissemination Architecture for IoT-Enabled Critical Infrastructure. Sensors 2023, 23, 8928.
📄 Tahmasebi, M. Beyond Defense: Proactive Approaches to Disaster Recovery and Threat Intelligence in Modern Enterprises. Journal of Information Security 2024, 15, 106–133.
📄 Roy, S.; et al. SoK: The MITRE ATT&CK Framework in Research and Practice. 2023.
📄 Wang, Z. A Systematic Literature Review on Cyber Threat Hunting. 2022.
📄 Bhardwaj, A.; et al. Proactive threat hunting to detect persistent behaviour-based advanced adversaries. Egyptian Informatics Journal 2024

Similar Articles

21-26 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.