Advancing Cyber Threat Intelligence Frameworks: Integrative Models, Sharing Mechanisms, and Predictive Analytics
Keywords:
Cyber threat intelligence, Information sharing, Predictive analytics, Diamond ModelAbstract
The rapid proliferation of cyber threats and the increasing sophistication of attacks have created an urgent need for comprehensive cyber threat intelligence (CTI) frameworks that enable proactive detection, effective response, and seamless information sharing. This study presents an integrative examination of contemporary CTI models, focusing on their conceptual foundations, operational applications, and interoperability across organizational boundaries. The paper explores traditional and emerging intelligence frameworks, including the Diamond Model, Lockheed Martin’s Cyber Kill Chain, MITRE ATT&CK, and AI-driven intelligence systems, emphasizing their roles in threat identification, prediction, and mitigation. Additionally, the research evaluates the mechanisms of cyber threat information exchange, the standardization of threat data formats, and the challenges associated with trust, privacy, and governance in collaborative intelligence environments. Using a qualitative meta-analytic approach to synthesize findings from peer-reviewed literature, industry reports, and applied case studies, the study highlights the practical and theoretical implications of integrating advanced machine learning, natural language processing, and anomaly detection methods into CTI operations. The results underscore that organizations leveraging dynamic, predictive intelligence frameworks achieve superior situational awareness, faster incident response, and more efficient containment of malware and advanced persistent threats. The discussion emphasizes limitations in current frameworks, including dependency on data quality, integration complexity, and the human factors influencing threat sharing. Finally, recommendations for future research and practice advocate the development of adaptive, trust-centric CTI platforms capable of real-time analytics and cross-sector collaboration. This study contributes to both the academic and professional domains by providing a robust, theoretically informed, and practically relevant roadmap for enhancing cyber defense capabilities through structured intelligence methodologies.
References
Abu, M. S., Selamat, S. R., Ariffin, A., & Yusof, R. (2018). Cyber threat intelligence–issue and challenges. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 10(1), 371-379.
Bakhshi, T., Papadaki, M., & Furnell, S. (2019). A practical assessment of social engineering vulnerabilities. Information & Computer Security, 27(2), 235-247.
Brown, K., & Johnson, L. (2021). Threat Intelligence Platforms: Aggregation and Analysis. Journal of Cybersecurity Research, 9(1), 45-58.
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016). A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(2), 1153-1176.
Burger, E. W., Goodman, M. D., Kampanakis, P., & Zhu, K. A. (2014). Taxonomy model for cyber threat intelligence information exchange technologies. Proc ACM Conf Comput Commun Secur, 2014–Novem(November), 51–60.
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(3), 1-58.
Chen, L., et al. (2023). Machine Learning Algorithms for Dynamic Threat Detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15(4), 789-802.
Chen, Y., et al. (2021). Big Data Analytics for Threat Intelligence. Journal of Cybersecurity Studies.
Cisco. (2022). Rapid Response in Cyber security. Retrieved from Cisco https://www.cisco.com/
Conti, M., Dehghantanha, A., Franke, K., & Watson, S. (2018). Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 544-546.
Hossain, M. (2021). Real-Time Anomaly Detection in SIEMs. Journal of Network Security.
Jones, M. (2022). Machine Learning for Cyber Defense. Security Innovations.
KPMG. (2013). Cyber threat intelligence and the lessons from law enforcement.
Liu, S. (2020). Integrating NLP with Cybersecurity. Journal of Information Assurance.
Naik, N., Jenkins, P., Grace, P., & Song, J. (2022). Comparing attack models for IT systems: Lockheed Martin’s Cyber Kill Chain, MITRE ATT&CK framework and diamond model. Proceedings of International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), IEEE, Vienna, Austria, 1–7.
NIST. (2016). Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing. Vol. 150.
Ponemon Institute LLC. (2015). The Cost of Malware Containment.
Ponemon Institute LLC. (2016). The Value of Threat Intelligence: A Study of North American & United Kingdom Companies Sponsored by Anomali.
Ramsdale, A., Shiaeles, S., & Kolokotronis, N. (2020). A comparative analysis of cyber-threat intelligence sources, formats, and languages. Electronics, 9(5), 824.
Rana, T., et al. (2023). Visualizing Cyber Threats. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
Sahrom, M., Selamat, S. R., Ariffin, A., & Robiah, Y. (2018). An enhancement of cyber threat intelligence framework. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10, 96–104.
Sánchez del Monte, A., & Hernández-Álvarez, L. (2023). Analysis of cyber-intelligence frameworks for AI data processing. Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9328.
Sharma, A., & Gupta, H. (2022). Predictive Threat Modeling in AI Systems. Future Computing Review.
Shukla, O. Enhancing Threat Intelligence and Detection with Real-Time Data Integration.
Smith, J. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity. CyberTech Journal.
Tidmarsh, D. (2023). What is the Diamond Model of Intrusion Analysis in cybersecurity. https://www.eccouncil.org/cybersecurity-exchange/ethical-hacking/diamond-model-intrusionanalysis
Tounsi, W. (2019). What is cyber threat intelligence and how is it evolving? Cyber‐Vigilance and Digital Trust: Cyber Security in the Era of Cloud Computing and
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John M. Callahan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.