Open Access
A Comprehensive Taxonomy and Critical Survey of Scientific Workflow Scheduling Paradigms in IaaS Cloud Computing: Evaluating Fitness for High-Stakes Environmental Modeling
4
Department of Computer Science, Global Data Resilience Laboratory, Singapore National University, Singapore
4
Faculty of Cyber-Physical Systems, Institute for Future Technologies, Valetta, Malta
Abstract
The escalating computational demands of modern science necessitate the use of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud platforms, particularly for large-scale, interdependent Scientific Workflows (SWFs). Critical high-stakes applications, such as the modeling of climate-induced seismicity (e.g., the link between rising sea levels and increased seismic activity in coastal regions), require scheduling solutions that ensure not only efficiency but also unparalleled reliability and deadline adherence. This paper provides a comprehensive, systematic survey and novel taxonomy of SWF scheduling algorithms in IaaS environments. The primary objective is to classify state-of-the-art methods and, critically, assess their inherent suitability and limitations when applied to time-sensitive, computationally-intensive research that must account for dynamic, real-world data, such as the 5% increase in seismic events since 2020. We propose a multi-dimensional taxonomy based on primary optimization objectives (e.g., makespan, cost, energy), algorithmic strategy (e.g., heuristic, meta-heuristic, hybrid), and resource provisioning models, performing a detailed analysis on the strengths and weaknesses of key contributions. Current scheduling paradigms exhibit strong performance on traditional benchmarks but reveal significant deficiencies when confronted with the strict reliability and fault tolerance required by critical environmental models, highlighting a prevalent trade-off between cost-effectiveness and system robustness. Ultimately, we conclude that current predictive models are insufficient—not only due to geophysical complexity but also because the underlying resource scheduling and provisioning mechanisms lack the necessary agility and guaranteed performance to accurately and reliably process the influx of high-velocity, high-volume data, underscoring the imperative for a new generation of reliability-aware, deadline-sensitive scheduling.
Keywords
Scientific Workflow,
IaaS Cloud Computing,
Task Scheduling,
Multi-Objective Optimization,
Taxonomy,
Climate Seismicity,
Resource Provisioning
References
R. Duan, T. Fahringer, R. Prodan, J. Qin, A. Villazon, and M. Wieczorek. Real world workflow applications in the askalon grid environment. European Grid Conference, Springer, page 454– 463, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508380_47.
X. Geng, Y. Mao, M. Xiong, and Y. Liu. An improved task scheduling algorithm for scientific workflow in cloud computing environment. Cluster Computing, 22:7539–7548, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1856-1.
S. Ostermann, A. Iosup, N. Yigitbasi, R. Prodan, T. Fahringer, and D. Epema. A performance analysis of ec2 cloud computing services for scientific computing. International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 642-12636-9_9.
C. N. Hoefer and G. Karagiannis. Taxonomy of cloud computing services. EEE Globecom Workshops, page 1345–1350, 2010.
J. Liu, J. Ren, W. Dai, D. Zhang, P. Zhou, Y. Zhang, G. Min, and N. Najjari. Online multi-workflow scheduling under uncertain task execution time in iaas clouds. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2019.
M. Zhu, Q. Wu, and Y. Zhao. A cost-effective scheduling algorithm for scientific workflows in clouds. IEEE 31st International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), page 256–265, 2012.
S. J. Nirmala and S. M. S. Bhanu. Catfish-pso based scheduling of scientific workflows in iaas cloud. Computing 98, page 1091–1109, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0494-9.
W. Jing, W. Qiang, and L. Xiongfei. A data placement and task scheduling algorithm in cloud computing. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 51, 2014.
R. Ghafouri, A. Movaghar, and M. Mohsenzadeh. A budget constrained scheduling algorithm for executing workflow application ininfrastructure as a service clouds. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 12:241–268, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0662-0.
J. Sun, L. Yin, M. Zou, Y. Zhang, T. Zhang, and J. Zhou. Makespan minimization workflow scheduling for complex networks with social groups in edge computing. Journal of Systems Architecture, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101799.
S. Su, J. Li, Q. Huang, X. Huang, K. Shuang, and J. Wang. Cost-efficient task scheduling for executing large programs in the cloud. Parallel Computing, 39:177–188, 2013.
V. Singh, I. Gupta, and P. K. Jana. An energy efficient algorithm for workflow scheduling in iaas cloud. Journal of Grid Computing, 18:357–376, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-019-09490-2.
X. Liu, W. Dou, J. Chen, S. Fan, S.C. Cheung, and S. Cai. On design, verification, and dynamic modification of the problem-based scientific workflow model. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15:1068–1088, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.06.003.
Asghari, M. K. Sohrabi, and F. Yaghmaee. Task scheduling, resource provisioning, and load balancing on scientific workflows using parallel sarsa reinforcement learning agents and genetic algorithm. The Journal of Supercomputing, page 1– 29, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-
-1.
X. Ye, J. Liang, S. Liu, and J. Li. A survey on scheduling workflows in cloud environment. International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers, page 344–348, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNISC.2015.91.
Vijindra and S. Shenai. Survey on scheduling issues in cloud computing. Procedia Engineering, 38:2881–2888, 2012.
K. Setrag and B. Marek. Groupware and workflow. Paris : Masson, 1998.
P. Lawrence. Workflow management coalition. Workflow Handbook, 1997.
T. E. El-Sayed, I.E Ali, and F.A Mohamed. Extended max-min scheduling using petri net and load balancing. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. (IJSCE), 2:198– 203, 2012.
Gupta, S. Gupta, A. Choudhary, and Jana P.K. A hybrid meta-heuristic approach for load balanced workflow scheduling in iaas cloud. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11319:73–89, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05366-6_6.
J. Gideon, C. Ann, D. Ewa, B. Shishir, M. Gaurang, and V. Karan. Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29:682–692, 2013.
Ludascher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, J. Lee, E.A.and Tao, and Y Zhao. Scientific workflow management and the kepler system. Concurrency and computation: Practice and experience, 18:1039–1065, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.994.
T. Oinn, M. Addis, J. Ferris, D. Marvin, M. Greenwood, T. Carver, A. Wipat, and P.L. Taverna. Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences. GGF10, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.993.
Taylor, M. Shields, I. Wang, and A. Harrison. The triana workflow environment: Architecture and applications. In Workflowsfor e-Science, Springer, pages 320–339, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 1-84628-757-2_20.
T. Fahringer, A. Jugravu, S. Pllana, R. Prodan, C. Seragiotto Jr, and H.L. Truong. Askalon: a tool set for cluster and grid computing. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 17:143– 169, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.929.
E. Deelman, G. Singh, M.H. Su, J. Blythe, Y. Gil, C. Kesselman, G. Mehta, K. Vahi, G.B. Berriman, J. Good, and A. Laity. Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Scientific Programming, 13:219–237, 2005.
G.J. Toomer. Ptolemy’s almagest. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 712, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691213361.
Y.H. Jia, W.N. Chen, H. Yuan, T. Gu, H. Zhang, Y. Gao, and J. Zhang. An intelligent cloud workflow scheduling system with time estimation and adaptive ant colony optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51:634–649, 2018.
S. Yassa, R. Chelouah, H. Kadima, and B. Granado. Multi-objective approach for energy-aware workflow scheduling in cloud computing environments. The Scientific World Journal, pages 634–649, 2013.
S. Yassa, J. Sublime, R. Chelouah, H. Kadima, G.S. Jo, and B. Granado. A genetic algorithm for multi- objective optimisation in workflow scheduling with hard constraints. International Journal of Metaheuristics, 2:415–433, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMHEUR.2013.058475.
M.A. Rodriguez and R. Buyya. Budget-driven scheduling of scientific workflows in iaas clouds with fine-grained billing periods. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 12:1–22, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041036.
V. Singh, I. Gupta, and P.K. Jana. A novel cost- efficient approach for deadline-constrained workflow scheduling by dynamic provisioning of resources. Future Generation Computer Systems, 79:95–110, 2018.
V. Arabnejad, K. Bubendorfer, and B. Ng. Budget and deadline aware e-science workflow scheduling in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed systems, 30:29–44, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2018.2849396.
X. Zhou, G. Zhang, J. Sun, J. Zhou, T. Wei, and S. Hu. Minimizing cost and makespan for workflow scheduling in cloud using fuzzy dominance sort based heft. Future Generation Computer Systems, 93:278–289, 2019.
Y. Gao, S. Zhang, and J. Zhou. A hybrid algorithm for multi-objective scientific workflow scheduling in iaas cloud. IEEE Access, 7:125783–125795, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939294.
H.R. Faragardi, M.R.S. Sedghpour, S. Fazliahmadi, T. Fahringer, and N. Rasouli. Grp-heft: A budget- constrained resource provisioning scheme for workflow scheduling in iaas clouds. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 31:1239–1254, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2019.2961096.
K. Kalyan Chakravarthi, L. Shyamala, and V. Vaidehi. Budget-aware scheduling algorithm for workflow applications in iaas clouds. Cluster Computing, 23:3405–3419, 2020.
J.E. Ndamlabin Mboula, V.C. Kamla, and C.T. Djamegni. Cost-time trade-off efficient workflow scheduling in cloud. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 103:102107, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102107.
Z. Wen, S. Garg, G.S. Aujla, K. Alwasel, D. Puthal, S. Dustdar, A.Y. Zomaya, and R. Ranjan. Running industrial workflow applications in a software- defined multicloud environment using green energy aware scheduling algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17:5645–5656, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3045690.
J.E. Ndamlabin Mboula, V.C. Kamla, and C. Tayou Djamégni. Dynamic provisioning with structure inspired selection and limitation of vms based cost- time efficient workflow scheduling in the cloud. Cluster Computing, 24:2697–2721, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03289-1.
Belgacem and K. Beghdad-Bey. Multi-objective workflow scheduling in cloud computing: trade-off between makespan and cost. Cluster Computing, 25:579–595, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03432-y. scheduling in iaas clouds. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3195956.
M. Hariri, M. Nouri-Baygi, and S. Abrishami. A hybrid algorithm for scheduling scientific workflows in iaas cloud with deadline constraint. The Journal of Supercomputing, pages 1–22, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04563-8.
S. Saeedi, R. Khorsand, S.G. Bidgoli, and M. Ramezanpour. Improved many-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for scientific workflow scheduling in cloud computing. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 147:106649, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106649.
Kesarpu, S., & Hari Prasad Dasari. (2025). Kafka Event Sourcing for Real-Time Risk Analysis. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3715
J.K. Konjaang, J. Murphy, and L. Murphy. Energy- efficient virtual-machine mapping algorithm (evima) for workflow tasks with deadlines in a cloud environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 203:103400, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103400.
L. Ye, Y. Xia, S. Tao, C. Yan, R. Gao, and Y. Zhan. Reliability-aware and energy-efficient workflowscheduling in iaas clouds. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3195956.
Vinod Kumar Enugala. (2025). "BIM-to-Field" Inspection Workflows for Zero Paper Sites. Utilitas Mathematica, 122(2), 372–404. Retrieved from https://utilitasmathematica.com/index.php/Index/ article/view/2711
M. Marwa, J.E. Hajlaoui, Y. Sonia, M.N. Omri, and C. Rachid. Multi-agent system-based fuzzy constraints offer negotiation of workflow scheduling in fog- cloud environment. Computing, pages 1–33, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-022-01148-4.
M. Mokni, S. Yassa, J.E. Hajlaoui, M.N. Omri, and R. Chelouah. Multi-objective fuzzy approach to scheduling and offloading workflow tasks in fog– cloud computing. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 123:102687, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102687.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dr. Mariam Al-Falasi, Dr. Tao Zhang, AUGMENTING SIEM WITH THREAT INTELLIGENCE FOR PREDICTIVE CYBER DEFENSE: A PROACTIVE THREAT HUNTING APPROACH , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 2 No. 03 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 03
- Haruto Nakamura, Yui Takahashi, Adaptive Authentication Framework for Agentic AI Ecosystems: Protocol Design, Trust Evaluation, and Security Analysis , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 09 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 09
- Nguyen Minh Khoa, Tran Thi Lan Anh, Strategic Business Transformation through Data Analytics, Sustainable Practices, and Innovation Management , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 09 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 09
- Dr. Tanvi Das, James D. Walker, A FEDERATED MULTI-MODAL SYSTEM FOR INSIDER THREAT DETECTION IN ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE USING BIOMETRIC AND CYBER DATA , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 01
- Prof. Emily Zhang, Luca Romano, DEFENDING AGAINST EVOLVING CYBER THREATS: A HYBRID FRAMEWORK FOR ATTACK PATTERN ANALYSIS AND INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 2 No. 04 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 04
- Chinedu Okafor, Amina Yusuf Bello, A Strategic HR Framework for Reducing Employee Attrition and Enhancing Talent Acquisition in the Indian Banking Sector , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 09 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 09
- Julia H. Whitaker, PROACTIVE CYBER THREAT HUNTING AND PREDICTIVE INTELLIGENCE IN CLOUD-ENABLED CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR RESILIENT DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 02 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 02
- Dr. Amara Ndlovu, Dr. Faisal Khan, CYBERSECURITY IN VIRTUAL GATHERINGS: RISKS AND REMEDIAL STRATEGIES FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING SOFTWARE , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 2 No. 04 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 04
- Ms. Shivani Jain, A Survey on Deep Learning Approaches for Malware Detection and Classification , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 08 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 08
- Dr. Alistair C. Finch, From Reactive to Predictive: A Framework for Integrating Threat Intelligence with SIEM for Proactive Threat Hunting , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 10
Similar Articles
- Dr. Alistair C. Finch, From Reactive to Predictive: A Framework for Integrating Threat Intelligence with SIEM for Proactive Threat Hunting , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 10
- Dr. Nyra Quellin, Strategic Risk-Based Cybersecurity Governance: Integrating Policy Frameworks, Organizational Controls, and Compliance Mechanisms for Contemporary Information Systems , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 01 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 01
- Dr. Elena Marovic, Dr. Sofia Markovic, Cybersecurity Governance and Resilience in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Socio-Technical, Resource-Based, and Regulatory Framework for Sustainable Digital Competitiveness , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 04 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 04
- Dr. Marcus A. Rodriguez, A Longitudinal Analysis of Cybersecurity Technology and Innovation: A Technology Mining Approach Using Bibliometric and Patent Analysis , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 05 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 05
- Dr. Lin K. Chen, A Novel Energy-Efficient and Secure Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Data Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 06 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 06
- Dr. Arjun Mehta, Dr. Priya Nair, Comprehensive Review of Modern Health Monitoring Technologies and Digital Healthcare Services , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 07 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 07
- Dr. Chinedu Okafor, Dr. Aisha Bello, An Intelligent Risk-Aware Security Framework for Detection and Prevention of Cyber Attacks on Critical Power Grid Infrastructure in Nigeria’s Electricity Sector , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 08 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 08
- Dr. Nguyen Van Minh, Dr. Tran Thi Lan, Cross-Layer Protocol Design and Integration Strategies for IoT and IoRT Convergence: An Analytical Review of Enabling Technologies, Challenges, and Emerging Solutions , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 08 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 08
- Daniel Okonkwo, AI-Powered Adaptive Threat Intelligence and Risk Mitigation Framework for Secure SAP S/4HANA Manufacturing Integration , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 08 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 08
- Lukas Schneider, Anna Müller, A STRIDE-Based Cybersecurity Framework for Threat Detection in Federated Identity and Access Management Systems , International Journal of Cyber Threat Intelligence and Secure Networking: Vol. 3 No. 09 (2026): Volume 03 Issue 09
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.